G&R Tactical
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: ATF's "Forward Observer" rifle...

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,149
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Funny thing is they shouldn't even do an RFP. Open purchase what they want in whatever numbers keeps them under the $25K Govt Purchase card limit.
    - Rhino

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    783
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    This litterally reads the exact same way as half the new posts in the general AR section. Not surprising given the original author.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,934
    Feedback Score
    0

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    94
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    They posted some pics on their Instagram. They look pretty sexy.

    Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    8,761
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by DarkTemplars View Post
    They posted some pics on their Instagram. They look pretty sexy.

    Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
    Where??



    Also roflz



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    “Answer The Bell...” J.W.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    94
    Feedback Score
    0
    Sorry, the Wilson Combat Instagram.

    Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,171
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SIGguy229 View Post
    Why? What "need" does the ATF have for a "forward observer" rifle?
    +1, There’s no legitimate need, but the literal answer is so that they won’t have to depend on local authorities when performing “operations”.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KCMH
    Posts
    2,558
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bret View Post
    +1, There’s no legitimate need, but the literal answer is so that they won’t have to depend on local authorities when performing “operations”.
    Gosh, that’s reassuring given the BATFEs track record.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •