Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: M&P 2.0 FS vs Compact preferences

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,078
    Feedback Score
    0
    If you comfortably get your full hand on the compact 2.0, and eject mags without them getting stopped from hitting your hand, get the 4 In compact.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    293
    Feedback Score
    0
    In addition to my 4 Shields, I bought the 2.0, 5” M&P, along with the 4 1/4”, 2, 4” Compacts, and a 3.6” Compact. The 5” gun is at my bedside, with a TLR 1 light.
    Since getting the Compacts, I sold the 4 1/4”. I love the concealability of the 4” Compacts, but the 3.6 has fast become my absolute favorite. Dead reliable, very accurate, great trigger out of the box, SUPERB handling, and just carries great. I don’t need anything but the 3.6 (for MY purpose’s. I’m going to add more.

    Skip

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Park City, UT
    Posts
    177
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    In your position, I would choose the 4" M2.0 Compact. By using the magazine sleeves you can easily replicate the full size magazine capacity if you find a need to do so. Therefore, capacity is a wash. The .25" difference in slide length is hardly significant, so that is also a wash, in my opinion. However, the shorter grip of the compact, when compared to the full size, is definitely easier to conceal. Therefore, the Compact is the winner for you.

    The only thing I had to do to my compact was to very slightly sand the side of the grip that rubs against my skin when carried IWB. I have about 4,000 rounds through my compact without a single failure.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,312
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Got an M2 Compact and an M2 Shield with it, thx for the insights. Will post an update after range test.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    288
    Feedback Score
    0
    Hope you enjoy them


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Akron, Ohio
    Posts
    476
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Fact that I cant really mount a decent light on the 3.6 compact is kind of a deal breaker for me. Have two 4" 2.0's but seeing its so close to the full size 4.25 I question why I did it. The new 4" shield looks interesting.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,312
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by crossgun View Post
    The new 4" shield looks interesting.
    It does, saw that and considered it yesterday. But I ultimately went the with the original Shield size, the logic being that when carrying this thing, I want it to be really compact, so I'll give up that extra barrel length for concealability.
    Last edited by maximus83; 05-24-19 at 10:28. Reason: fix sentence

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •