Beretta Cheetah 84 FS (13+1) or 85 FS (8+1 but thinner). Both .380 acp.
Mec-gar mags $20.
DA / SA and frame mounted safety / decocker.
https://www.bing.com/th?id=OIP.CT0Gm...=7&o=5&pid=1.7
Beretta Cheetah 84 FS (13+1) or 85 FS (8+1 but thinner). Both .380 acp.
Mec-gar mags $20.
DA / SA and frame mounted safety / decocker.
https://www.bing.com/th?id=OIP.CT0Gm...=7&o=5&pid=1.7
RLTW
“What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.
Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.
Also, to the OP, kahr pm9 has a safety model now. I carry a non safety version occasionally, but like you would prefer a safety. I normally carry HK firearms, p30s and usp. Pm9 has basically the same manual of arms and feel as a lem usp, just a lot smaller.
I think mine has been 100% in my hands. I actually just used it in a competition last weekend. However, the few people besides me that have tried it experienced non stop jamming. I think it has to do with grip strength and recoil management, because again, I dont remember ever having an issue with it.
I've read a lot of internet complaints on pm9s and they may be valid... no idea. I think some of it is also like the people who have tried mine and just cant handle the pistol for some reason.... I dont know.
I have a shield 45 also and it always fires, but sometimes has issues with the slide locking back. I like it but it feels quite a bit different from the HKs. It's not a natural transition like to the pm9.
Just my personal experience
I have seen Glocks with thumb safeties. It's an aftermarket part but it's out there
P30sks or Nighthawk T3/ T4
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
老僧三十年前未參禪時、見山是山、見水是水、及至後夾親見知識、有箇入處、見山不是山、見水不是水、而今得箇體歇處、依然見山秪是山、見水秪是水。
https://www.instagram.com/defaultmp3/
S&W Shield is your answer.
Gettin' down innagrass.
Let's Go Brandon!
Can you explain why you prefer a manual safety vs non for primary CCW? I understand everyone has their opinions but I'm curious.
This is how I approach this and only my worthless opinion.
The absolute last thing I would ever want to think about if my life is now in the tipping scales of a criminals hand is the real possibility to fumble with a manual safety. I'm talking about a real life- live or die situation, not what you perceive in your head will happen. Most people think they have time, can create sepearation etc- not realistic IMO.
What if you are in a one on one struggle on the ground? If you are semi incapacitated by a blow, ambushed from behind, hurt, the long list goes on. Is having that manual safety going to outweigh the possibility you will fumble with it? I understand practice can help negate those possibilities but most people do not train realistically and that extra second or two could have undesired consequences.
If you are holstering a firearm (not floating around in your pocket or a womans purse- do NOT recommend that) then that is your safety.. draw, point, shoot. Take away anything else that doesnt simplify that equation.
Anyone else have reasoning behind needing/wanting a manual safety for your primary CCW?
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
The possibility of accidentally discharging the firearm while reholstering is the main reason I like having a manual safety. This can happen when a wad of t-shirt or clothing gets in the trigger guard or sits on top of the holster. Draw cord adjusters should be removed from all cover garments.
http://gundigest.com/reviews/draw-qu...&rid=233879035
Bookmarks