Edit: duplicate post, mods please delete this one.
Edit: duplicate post, mods please delete this one.
Last edited by Hammer_Man; 05-22-19 at 15:34.
Thanks for sharing. Now I understand what you were saying. It does look different. From what I’m gathering, this appears the new way Colt is now marking their lowers now with the laser engraving.
I made a false statement earlier. I thought the roll mark on my copy purchased in 9/2018 was also laser engraved but it is not. The logo and text is traditional stamping and the only the S/N is laser.
Personally, I don’t mind the way yours looks but I get it. Do you mind me asking what’s different from your issued M4A1 other than look? Are the words the same? Not being critical, genuinely curious to learn.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Marines issue KAC 600M BUIS, which are 429 times nicer than the Matech's we get issued. And I won't know why you wouldn't run BUIS, while standard ACOG mounts aren't fast to remove, if things are getting spicy and it's either damaged or it's zero is totally off it's nice to have that option (plus they don't really take up space or weight).
PRAISE THE FALLEN
SSG Kevin Roberts KIA 7-May-08
1Lt Nick Dewhirst KIA 20-July-08
Cpl Charles Gaffney KIA 24-Dec-08
Spc Peter Courcy KIA 10-Feb-09
PFC Jason Watson KIA 10-Feb-09
I do not believe that is correct. I actually researched this myself several months ago after I received my Colt M4A1 as I’d never seen the . after MM before.
Combat_Diver (also a member and SME here who is/was a highly skilled .mil armorer) posted pics from Astan on TOS back in 2018 of actual issue FN M4A1 on the rack and the FN M4A1 CARBINE rollmark also included the . after MM. So obviously this mark is part of the standard M4A1 rollmark.
Also interesting, those particular issued FN M4A1 he posted pics of had C stamped uppers.
I’d link to TOS thread and show the pic but that’s not allowed per M4c.net rules.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by arptsprt; 05-23-19 at 06:19.
Thanks for the great info!!
Exactly. Arguing for the sake of arguing when not productive or helpful as related to the stated thread title and questions the OP is asking about a COLT SOCOM.
That said, unless things have changed with the FN, the FN M4A1 does not have the proper “Property of US Gov’t” rollmark. It is true the FN has the Auto rollmark at the proper position on the lower at selector switch - which the Colt does not.
Also, there are some other minor deviations with the barrel including length and no “flats” under handguard.
Also, I believe Colt is still under contract by Uncle Sugar to provide some level of M4A1 to the military.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bookmarks