Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Got the rifle...... now looking scope

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    84
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodriver View Post
    Woo. Fun stuff. Thanks for chiming in Jimmy. Let me explain my reasoning for my comments and the nickname.

    Before I begin, I actually don’t have a problem with Vortex, but I do with “vortex people”. Don’t worry. I’ll get to that.

    I have bought no fewer than 6 Vortex optics. I have your sick ass Kaibab Binos and a LRF. Plus Gen I PSTs scopes save for a recent Gen2 1-6 (which I literally bought in April [a noteworthy date], I can provide the receipts if there are doubts) My buddies all have the Razors, and several members here I have met in person have those optics as well and use without issues. We shoot PRS and 2 gun. The binos work great. So does the LRF. I also do a lot of what I used to consider mild abuse (NV shooting in thick brush/swamps, throwing guns around in the back of side by sides, leaving them outside during rainstorms), but after meeting more and more shooters has shown me is certainly not the norm for “mild”.

    The first two scopes I bought (PST Gen I) had to go back due to turret issues before I even shot them. They were bought from Liberty Optics. I could not turn the windage turret at all. Colleen handled my issues very nicely, but your warranty didn’t cover the $65 (each) in packing materials and insurance to ship my scope back. This was Feb 20, 2015 if you’d like to look at your records. Poortex originated in those days. Because I was poor after sending them back.

    I should have had a bad taste in my mouth, but the replacements worked fine and for the price point did what I wanted....for a while. I noticed wandering zero’s especially after drops. This never happened with nightforce scopes (admittedly, the only other quality brand scope I’ve used). One such instance occurred when I finished a tank trap stage, didn’t remember the bag was clipped to my belt and the rifle did a summersault and landed scope first on the concrete. The scope just never acted right after that. Again, PST Gen I. I took a gamble because an SME on M4C whom I trust recommended your 1-6 Gen 2 and it hasn’t let me down despite being beaten up (it outlasted my iPhone in Texas) I would still rather have an NXS because I don’t “feel” as confident with your PSTs due to my experiences. Surely, I am not comparing a $600 scope to a $1300 scope but my point from the last post and this is that it’s been my experience that getting the $600 scope isn’t worth it in the first place.

    As time went on I got more scopes and ended up bringing a NF equipped scope to a Guardian match which you guys sponsor. It’s a great charity and I think you guys do a good job with that, but many of the people who hosted the match were giving me shit for my NF. I don’t talk gear. In fact, I don’t talk to many gun guys at all. I just like shooting. So to walk in and have match directors talking about how I overpaid for a NF and all the other shooters running around with their Vortex hats (while failing the Vortex challenge #manylols) was a little annoying to listen to (especially while I was spotting through my Kaibabs.)

    All of the above leads to this. I’ve also tried to steer guys to *your* optics such as Gen2 PSTs and razors only to have them say bah. That’s too much money. Then they buy your low end stuff and struggle. I think Vortex created this culture because there are $200 Diamondback scopes and $2000 Razors. Guys think they get the same quality from both because of the lifetime warranty. (If it doesn’t work, I’ll just send it back) I can’t blame them. I have the same concerns after shipping back some of yours and losing zeros. Did I want to risk $2k on a heavy Razor when I could spend $2500 on an ATACR and not have the lingering doubts? No. Unfortunately I did not. As I said, my buddies all use Razors and have no issues. But I can’t bring myself to buy one because your lower tier lines let me down. Nightforce doesn’t have that problem because they don’t have lower tiers.

    Speaking of quality, I’m still confused why your scopes weigh so freaking much but cannot handle the same level of scope ring torque that a NF does. (NF 1-8 is 17oz. Vortex 1-6 is 24ish.)

    I’ve also got complaints about your reticles. Specifically, why can’t I easily find how many MOA are between subtensions on my 1-6? I had to measure it myself. Is that intentional? The manual is showing like 3 units of measure for 6 sub tension lines. What does that even mean? I also had another scope on a hunting 300blk setup. I think it was a diamondback. It had the same issue.

    I’d link a pic of the reticle from the manual, and If this isn’t coherent, I apologize. My 4th started early and I’m about 3 Woodford’s in. I also know it’s a bit unfair to come at you publicly with my side of the story without you knowing all the facts. Maybe my gripe isn’t even with Vortex (after all, I continue to buy your stuff and I even wear one of your T Shirts I won at a Guardian match to the gym). Maybe my gripe is just with the people who defend you guys so vehemently.
    We understand 100% of what you are saying to a "T". In many cases, yes, the fact that we run the gambit of products from your entry level $150 riflescope all the way up to your top tier $2500 riflescope, and thus, sell to the guy or gal who has literally never touched a gun or scope before in their life to folks who have been shooting since exiting the womb, is somewhat of a blessing and a curse. More people are able to shoot Vortex, we're able to have the resources to put towards the development/testing/equipment for future products and innovation, new great products across the board help the brand stay relevant to a lot of different people (Shooters, hunters, birders, recreational kayaking hippies, etc), blah blah blah... A curse because dudes and gals who are optics snobs scoff at any brand that sells an entry level product also making a high end product and too many people expecting that because we make a high end product that the entry level product is pretty much the same exact thing but magically cheaper. the curse part is more of a side effect - it's not like we try to stoke that fire - it just happens and we go on with business/life just doing what we know best and maybe helping a few people realize they shouldn't attempt the King of 2 Miles ELR challenge with a capped-turret Crossfire II Hog Hunter 3-12x56 AO despite the fact "It's objective lens is huge" along the way.

    Like we said - you're not wrong because you shoot NF scopes. They're awesome, you feel most comfortable behind that glass and you've had a great track record with them from the sounds of it. That, in and of itself, is priceless, so for someone to come up and say "Ya PaId TOo MuCH FeR THaT NiGht FoArCE" is silly. It's worth what it's worth to you. Do we think we make a damn good competing product, too, though? Sure. It sounds like the PST experience you had was with the Gen I primarily, which was a fine scope for us and arguably the reason other scopes like the SHV even came into existence, but the Gen II PST is a much better scope all around. Again, not saying that to get you to go and switch your arsenal to PST Gen II's, but just passing along the fact we're always looking to improve.

    As for the torque specs on the tubes, not really sure what to tell you there. They don't need to be torqued any tighter. We've been running those specs forever now and none of our scopes are slipping or having any issue with recoil at that rating and it's not putting any stress on the tube. They get torqued tighter than that all the time by people who hate directions and work just fine, but it's more of a crap shoot once you start strangling the thing - sometimes it works, many times it doesn't. Overtorqued rings is one of the biggest problems all scope companies in our industry face. They may list higher specs, but with how many of our optics are used in dangerous places by dangerous people or even just competition getting the crap kicked out of them all over the place, it's hard to say the tubes are problematic (Admittedly, we don't have every scope on the market in house and sliced open to compare, but we've got a pretty good idea of what folks are working with). The weight is certainly there, but weight doesn't automatically equal durability. Glass and, in many cases, simply the material certain components are machined from in order to achieve the tolerances necessary are just heavier. The Razor AMG is a perfect example - There's a lot of glass in that scope, but most of the materials used inside are a lighter weight material than those in the Razor Gen II, because we machine them in house and have developed processes our factories overseas can't mimic to still achieve the proper tolerances in machining with these materials. With those big changes and some tricky engineering, you've got a scope that's 20 ounces lighter than the Gen II Razor and arguably even more strong. It's also $500ish dollars more.

    Reticles - Give us a call some time. Just checked out the reticle manual for what we think is the reticle you're talking about and it seemed to make sense, but we're also the ones who wrote it so maybe it sucks. Always happy to chat subtensions on the phone (800-426-0048 Ext. 5)

    That one time you had to spend a bunch of money to send in new scopes for turret issues - We effed up. You should have gotten a shipping label to get those back because they were new.

    Anyway - Hopefully that was some mildly interesting reading material for your holiday. We appreciate you using our stuff in the areas of your kit you mentioned that have Vortex represented. Like we said - no issues at all with your recommendations, just feeling scrappy today. Could use a few brews ourselves!

    Cheers and Happy 4th


    - Jimmy H

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    6
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks all of you guys for your helpfull reply. Finally took the Burris Xtreme Tactical XTRII 3-15x50mm SCR Mil

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    12,145
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Jimmy and I talked for almost 40 minutes and discussed everything above. He pointed some things out and educated me a bit. He’s a great guy, and Vortex has been doing big things since the Gen I PSTs.

    I’m ready to put a Vortex on my next rifle.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    1,332
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodriver View Post
    Jimmy and I talked for almost 40 minutes and discussed everything above. He pointed some things out and educated me a bit. He’s a great guy, and Vortex has been doing big things since the Gen I PSTs.

    I’m ready to put a Vortex on my next rifle.
    LOL they got you back cheap.


    It's Leica or Die for me.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Posts
    8,726
    Feedback Score
    88 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodriver View Post
    Jimmy and I talked for almost 40 minutes and discussed everything above. He pointed some things out and educated me a bit. He’s a great guy, and Vortex has been doing big things since the Gen I PSTs.

    I’m ready to put a Vortex on my next rifle.
    Don’t you have a PST Gen II 1-6 on the shorty that you were grouping Wolf Gold with?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Sic semper tyrannis.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    12,145
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wake27 View Post
    Don’t you have a PST Gen II 1-6 on the shorty that you were grouping Wolf Gold with?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Yeah I do. And I like it and it stood up to everything even noonesshowmonkey (or Firefly, can’t remember) dropping it out of the bed of a pickup. I know it’s a lot of text but the above explains why I’m ok buying their mid range stuff but won’t shell out the coin for a Razor over a NF.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mid-West, USA
    Posts
    2,824
    Feedback Score
    63 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mpalmr8999 View Post
    Thanks all of you guys for your helpfull reply. Finally took the Burris Xtreme Tactical XTRII 3-15x50mm SCR Mil
    Let us know how it works for you. I'm always interested in seeing what works for people.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    2,976
    Feedback Score
    94 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by taekwondopreacher View Post
    Let us know how it works for you. I'm always interested in seeing what works for people.
    Not that it’s this scope but I’ve had 3 Burris XTR II Extreme Tactical scopes (1-8, 1.5-8, and 5-25h) and I was always impressed with glass quality and the ruggedness of the scope. They aren’t exactly light with 34mm tubes, but they were/are damn solid. Worth every cent.
    "Texas has yet to learn submission to any oppression, come from what source it may."
    ~ Sam Houston

    “The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil constitution, are worth defending against all hazards: And it is our duty to defend them against all attacks.”
    ~ Sam Adams

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Where The Wind Never Blows, Wyoming
    Posts
    2,200
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodriver View Post
    Jimmy and I talked for almost 40 minutes and discussed everything above. He pointed some things out and educated me a bit. He’s a great guy, and Vortex has been doing big things since the Gen I PSTs.

    I’m ready to put a Vortex on my next rifle.
    Euro, I believe in karma and bad juju. You bring another Vortex into the fold and your Nightforces are going to rebel. You'll be filling out RAs to NF big time. I have a small stable of Vortex products. Viper HD 20-60 spotter, Spitfire AR, Spitfire 3X, Razor Gen 2 1-6. If I bring a NF SHV into the mix, I just know I'll be PMing Jimmy days on end about what the hell is happening to my Poor-, I mean Vortex's! Oh, and don't accept any Vortex swag from Jimmy, like caps and t-shirts, not even decals. That will surly doom your NF scopes. NF charges big time to send one of their spec-ops guys to perform an exorcism to clear out the bad Vortex juju. Could take days, maybe weeks.

    When you get the urge to buy a Vortex start getting drunk until the urge passes. Your family of NFs will bless you with precision groups at any target, at any range. No bullshit! Have a Happy & Memorable 4th.

    P.S. Jimmy, Do you think you can send me a Vortex cap. I don't think Euro really wants one now that he knows the back story!

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    84
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 3 AE View Post
    Euro, I believe in karma and bad juju. You bring another Vortex into the fold and your Nightforces are going to rebel. You'll be filling out RAs to NF big time. I have a small stable of Vortex products. Viper HD 20-60 spotter, Spitfire AR, Spitfire 3X, Razor Gen 2 1-6. If I bring a NF SHV into the mix, I just know I'll be PMing Jimmy days on end about what the hell is happening to my Poor-, I mean Vortex's! Oh, and don't accept any Vortex swag from Jimmy, like caps and t-shirts, not even decals. That will surly doom your NF scopes. NF charges big time to send one of their spec-ops guys to perform an exorcism to clear out the bad Vortex juju. Could take days, maybe weeks.

    When you get the urge to buy a Vortex start getting drunk until the urge passes. Your family of NFs will bless you with precision groups at any target, at any range. No bullshit! Have a Happy & Memorable 4th.

    P.S. Jimmy, Do you think you can send me a Vortex cap. I don't think Euro really wants one now that he knows the back story!
    You win a cap for creativity and the fact that I spit out my OJ this morning reading that and laughing so hard. Plz send PM

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •