Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 64

Thread: Mrgunsngear: Palmetto State Armory 10.5'' Nitride 5.56 AR-15 Pistol: Best Truck Gun?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,251
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Safari View Post
    And what will that mean?

    Nothing, as long as you aren’t using any muzzle devices that require shims or peel washers. Just a possible explanation for why the OD of the crush washer looks barely tightened.

    If you do try to put a mount on it, or a brake that requires shims, you will find that 1/2” washers/shims won’t seat on the shoulder. Assuming it has the false shoulder, and every PSA barrel I’ve inspected does.
    RLTW

    “What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.

    Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1168 View Post
    Nothing, as long as you aren’t using any muzzle devices that require shims or peel washers. Just a possible explanation for why the OD of the crush washer looks barely tightened.

    If you do try to put a mount on it, or a brake that requires shims, you will find that 1/2” washers/shims won’t seat on the shoulder. Assuming it has the false shoulder, and every PSA barrel I’ve inspected does.
    So if I'm reading this correctly, a Smith Vortex that doesn't require either a shim or crush washer would be GTG, but another muzzle device that requires either would not?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,251
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Safari View Post
    So if I'm reading this correctly, a Smith Vortex that doesn't require either a shim or crush washer would be GTG, but another muzzle device that requires either would not?
    It is possible that it won’t seat on the shoulder. If thats the case, it’ll be super obvious if you try it.
    RLTW

    “What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.

    Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,123
    Feedback Score
    0
    The Vortex has a recessed area with a rim that will extend over the barrel shoulder slightly. Inside that recess is what should make contact with the barrel shoulder. If I'm tracking 1168 correctly, it's possible that the muzzle device will stop against the false shoulder instead. Correct me if I am wrong.

    images.jpg

    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Safari View Post
    So if I'm reading this correctly, a Smith Vortex that doesn't require either a shim or crush washer would be GTG, but another muzzle device that requires either would not?

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    And can somebody find or post a pic of this false shoulder. I'm not sure I know what everybody is talking about.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,251
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Safari View Post
    And can somebody find or post a pic of this false shoulder. I'm not sure I know what everybody is talking about.
    https://imgur.com/a/qsPrZvl

    Let me know if you’re able to see it. I apologize for the crude scribbling.
    RLTW

    “What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.

    Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1168 View Post
    https://imgur.com/a/qsPrZvl

    Let me know if you’re able to see it. I apologize for the crude scribbling.
    I see it. You're talking about that short, non-threaded area just as the threads end and the fatter part of the barrel begins?

    Why would they do that?

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,251
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Safari View Post
    I see it. You're talking about that short, non-threaded area just as the threads end and the fatter part of the barrel begins?

    Why would they do that?
    Yup. And its ~9/16” in diameter vs 1/2” of the threads.

    The why is the part that baffles me. Is it a cheaper way to cut threads? I don’t know. Seems unlikely. It also baffles me that this is not readily found by internet searches. Surely, I’m not the only one that notices stuff like this. It was blatantly obvious, immediately, when I tried to upgrade the muzzle device. I’ll have to take some pictures of the barrels on display next time I shoot at PSA.
    RLTW

    “What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.

    Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1168 View Post
    Yup. And its ~9/16” in diameter vs 1/2” of the threads.

    The why is the part that baffles me. Is it a cheaper way to cut threads? I don’t know. Seems unlikely. It also baffles me that this is not readily found by internet searches. Surely, I’m not the only one that notices stuff like this. It was blatantly obvious, immediately, when I tried to upgrade the muzzle device. I’ll have to take some pictures of the barrels on display next time I shoot at PSA.
    Well, in a way it saves me the trouble of putting an aftermarket muzzle device on it. Guess I'll have to put the Smith Vortex on the BCM upper if I go that route.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,251
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Safari View Post
    Well, in a way it saves me the trouble of putting an aftermarket muzzle device on it. Guess I'll have to put the Smith Vortex on the BCM upper if I go that route.
    If it doesn’t play nice with the Vortex, you can probably just bump the shoulder forward with some 9/16” shims. I used a slightly reamed Griffin M4SD overtravel stop to bump the shoulder forward, because I had a few on hand. But try it, it might go on properly if the threads are recessed a bit. Just check alignment before firing.

    Not necessarily directed at Doc Safari:
    Obviously, anyone seeking to eff with mounts on a shoulder like this should seek advice from a competent gunsmith and/or check alignment before firing. Maybe consider a .30 cal can. Don’t blame me if you wreck an endcap on your $1,000 silencer after mounting it to your $499 rifle.
    RLTW

    “What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.

    Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •