If demographics are Corvette's biggest problem, the launch video was completely wrong. Maybe they were reinforcing their base, but they people they should be targeting won't remember the Challenger exploding, let alone the moon landing.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Wondering if the mid-engine was a request by the racing team?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Philippians 2:10-11
To argue with a person who renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. ~ Thomas Paine
“The greatest conspiracy theory is the notion that your government cares about you”- unknown.
Except he's riding a Kawasaki Ninja H2 in the trailer.
1971 to 1974 had several issues that killed American performance car glory yeras
The C1 averaged about 6.5k sales per year.
The C2, retrospectively the most lauded, about 25k per year.
The C3, also occurring during the peak performance classic years before gas, smog, exhaust, compression, insurance raised their head etc. - debuted at about 35k, waned, resurged midlife to over 50k a year, and exited averaging about 40k.
The C4 came on the scene at over 50k and soon became a 20k a year car.
The C5 averaged mid 30s.
The C6 struggled to stay in the teens after the first few years.
Selling 12k Corvettes mid model run to a population of 282 million
Compared to selling 40k mid model at the deepest slump of performance to 216 million Americans is a huge issue.
The C7 numbers should be familiar to those looking at the
C8.
The C3 was weak in 70 and 71 but bounced back hard, doubling sales.
“Where weapons may not be carried, it is well to carry weapons.”
Bookmarks