G&R Tactical
Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 4121314
Results 131 to 136 of 136

Thread: What Agency just granted STI a contract?

  1. #131
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    342
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by noonesshowmonkey View Post
    You seem to make a living insinuating that people are internalizing things way beyond reason. I honestly don't care what guns people use, or what gun an agency uses. As someone who carried a weapon for a living, I know how minor considerations about weapon A vs weapon B really are in the grander scheme of the skills required in an LE job. That said, looking at a problem objectively and seeing that they are overpaying for a weapon system whose only advantage over competitors is raw accuracy on a flat range isn't getting butthurt.

    It is objective analysis.

    Logic is hard, I know, but you might try it once in a while.
    What did they pay for the guns?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. #132
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    499
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by lsllc View Post
    What did they pay for the guns?
    Your attempts at cleverness are cute.

    There is no way, short of robbery, that they could get those guns cheaper than a Glock 19/17/34 MOS with an RMR. Or any competitive duty pistol set up with an RMR. Or even something like an SAO Sig Legion with an RMR. Given that the MSRP of the pistols as configured is north of $2,000, you could buy two or three other pistols and still come out ahead.

    As far as I know, the actual cost per unit isn't publicized. If you think that not knowing the price, especially when we have comparative numbers, is somehow going to justify their purchase 'better', then have at it.

    Literally every time you've tried to debate something in a thread, you've shown your analytic capacity to be that of an 8th grade troll.
    Last edited by noonesshowmonkey; 09-06-19 at 13:48. Reason: 2011 cost link, ya shitass.

  3. #133
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    342
    Feedback Score
    0

    What Agency just granted STI a contract?

    Retracted.

    Not feeding the trolls.
    Last edited by lsllc; 09-06-19 at 13:52.

  4. #134
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    499
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by lsllc View Post
    Retracted.

    Not feeding the trolls.
    I literally just spit coffee on my laptop when I read this.

    You are the first internet spit take for a laugh I've had in a while.

    At least you're good at humor.

  5. #135
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    342
    Feedback Score
    0
    Again, letís reiterate the facts:

    The highest performance pistol was chosen with the highest scores and no reliability problems.

    We do not know what the testing protocol was.

    The decision was nearly unanimous.

    The pistol is the same manual of arms as has been used by the agency for decades.

    The agency was able to make custom changes to production models.

    Nobody knows what was paid for the pistols.

    Perhaps this thread needs to close before more people get their feelings hurt and lash out because they donít like the decision that doesnít affect them.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #136
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,852
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Well, it's Friday! The hard week of beating horses and bitching about crap that doesn't matter sure has taken it's toll.
    GET IN YOUR BUBBLE!

Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 4121314

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •