^^ this is what I put on mine from the get go.Originally Posted by 1168
Double the thread engagement and cradle the optic vs leaving air gaps front and rear and putting all the inertia and stress on two screws.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
^^ this is what I put on mine from the get go.
Double the thread engagement and cradle the optic vs leaving air gaps front and rear and putting all the inertia and stress on two screws.
Site Sponsor
See the area in front of the RMR? This is the C&H plate front that fills in the gap between the RMR and slide.
It was a snug, not tight fit.
POW-MIA, #22untilnone
Let Us #NeverForget!
If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
The last thing I want to do is hurt you,
but it's still on my list.
Senior Member
Yes, same plate I used. I shot 250rds last night and no issues.
This is my first red dot pistol, but I am here to stay.
That dot is such a fine aiming point, and better than a front sight post.
While zeroing at 25yds I was happy to see a very nice tight group, and it took minimal adjustment, like 3-4 clicks right and I was done.
Everything remained tight, time and more rounds will tell though.
Member
That C&H plate would be awesome if it was made of steel and not aluminum. Aluminum isn’t a very good material for that application.
Banned
I had asked them this very same question and the refuted that assumption in earnest so?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Member
That’s like asking a baker if his cakes are good.I had asked them this very same question and the refuted that assumption in earnest so?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Site Sponsor
Still a better design than the OEM Glock platesI had asked them this very same question and the refuted that assumption in earnest so?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
POW-MIA, #22untilnone
Let Us #NeverForget!
If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong.
The last thing I want to do is hurt you,
but it's still on my list.
Member
Design yes but the material makes the Glock mos plate the better option
Site Sponsor
The stock MOS plate is certainly not the better option. If C&H was using balsa wood it would probably still be better.
RLTW
“What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.
Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.
Member
The stock isn’t designed better but the material is better. Someone really needs to develop a plate just like C&H’s but use billet steel. I can’t believe someone hasn’t yet. I’ll keep using the stock plate until then. Haven’t had any issues with my gen 5 34 with over 4000 through it with the stock plate.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks