Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 88

Thread: San Fran Board of Supervisors declare that the NRA is a terrorist organization

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    702
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    San Fran Board of Supervisors declare that the NRA is a terrorist organization

    https://m.sfgate.com/bayarea/article...medium=ios_app

    So does this mean that city employees who are NRA members will be fired or possibly worse because of their membership?
    A person who is not inwardly prepared for the use of violence against him is always weaker than the person committing the violence. - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    DFW, TEXAS
    Posts
    4,391
    Feedback Score
    274 (99%)
    Quote Originally Posted by TexHill View Post
    https://m.sfgate.com/bayarea/article...medium=ios_app

    So does this mean that city employees who are NRA members will be fired or possibly worse because of their membership?
    The city of San Francisco IS a domestic Terrorist group.
    In no way do I make any money from anyone related to the firearms industry.


    "I have never heard anyone say after a firefight that I wish that I had not taken so much ammo.", ME

    "Texas can make it without the United States, but the United States can't make it without Texas !", General Sam Houston

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13,549
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Given the demographically more common black criminality; what does that make the NAACP?

    Or ACT UP/GLAAD for people intentionally spreading HIV?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    The Sticks, TN
    Posts
    4,161
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Yes, this will definitely fix SF’s:

    1. Homeless problem
    2. Poop on the sidewalks problem
    3. Drug use problem
    4. Rampant crime problem (30,000 car break-ins last year and still going strong)

    Yes, well played by the mentally ill SF government.
    Philippians 2:10-11

    To argue with a person who renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. ~ Thomas Paine

    “The greatest conspiracy theory is the notion that your government cares about you”- unknown.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,904
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    The City of San Francisco should be adjudicated mentally incompetent and treated as such.
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KCMH
    Posts
    2,985
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by docsherm View Post
    The city of San Francisco IS a domestic Terrorist group.
    With all of the human feces on the sidewalks and the tourist “poop maps”, yes indeed, SF is a domestic terrorist group.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    2,984
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TexHill View Post
    https://m.sfgate.com/bayarea/article...medium=ios_app

    So does this mean that city employees who are NRA members will be fired or possibly worse because of their membership?
    Certainly, it's pure Alinsky. You identify your enemy, isolate them, marginalize them, then destroy them.
    Maj. USAR (Ret) 160th SOAR, 2/17 CAV
    NRA Life Member
    Black Mesa Ranch. Raising Fine Cattle and Horses in San Miguel County since 1879

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    6,916
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    "I'll take 'how is San Francisco relevant?' for $200, Alex...."

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,381
    Feedback Score
    0
    And Jose Ines Garcia-Zarate, who actually shot and killed Kate Steinle while in San Fran, isn't guilty of murder or manslaughter....

    Sanctuary cities kill more people than the NRA....
    Last edited by FromMyColdDeadHand; 09-04-19 at 12:41.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,144
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I can't see how anyone can think this is funny. You are being marginalized, scapegoated. They are prepping the battle space, the public square, moving the Overton Window, with the ultimate purpose of your elimination. That's what this and other efforts like it are. Period. If you don't understand and see this for what it truly is, you're wrong.
    The truth can only offend those who live a lie.

Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •