Page 22 of 45 FirstFirst ... 12202122232432 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 441

Thread: Colt to Suspend Civilian sells of AR's

  1. #211
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,494
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    The rumor is still spreading, GAT Daily was reporting the RSR Group bad-info like it was an exclusive leak yesterday. Guess that's one newsletter I can Unsubscribe... ISTR an old saying about "the lie gets halfway around the world before the truth even has its boots on."

    Quote Originally Posted by OldState View Post
    “Flagship” doesn’t mean their absolute best. After all their current flagship is the plain 6920.

    Am I lower would be outstanding but I don’t think the monolithic upper would be a big enough seller...plus the LMT royalties on top of the UAW probably would take a big cut in profits.
    Does the Colt Canada IUR have the same licensing from LMT, or is it a homegrown parallel development? If the latter, that might be an answer...
    Last edited by Diamondback; 09-17-19 at 19:45.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  2. #212
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    3,144
    Feedback Score
    50 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    Does the Colt Canada IUR have the same licensing from LMT, or is it a homegrown parallel development? If the latter, that might be an answer...
    I don’t recall if there was parallel development, but there is LMT involvement at some level.

  3. #213
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Central New Yorkistan
    Posts
    1,325
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sry0fcr View Post
    I'm almost certain that their contract was extended late last year in a split with FN.
    I saw an article that said Colt and FN currently have a joint contract to supply the DoD with M4 and M4A1 Carbines through 2020.

    NYH1.

    ROLLTIDE!
    NYSRPA Member.

  4. #214
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    4
    Feedback Score
    0
    Deleted
    Last edited by jojo; 09-18-19 at 16:57.

  5. #215
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    S.E. PA
    Posts
    1,700
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodriver View Post
    No.

    But AU sold out of their $899 6920s in 3 days. They had 22 in stock when I began buying some.
    I bought one of them...and really wasn’t currently in the market for a compete rifle purchase. If this is a tactic they suckered me.
    Last edited by OldState; 09-18-19 at 07:17.
    "A flute without holes, is not a flute. A donut without a hole, is a Danish." - Ty Webb

  6. #216
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,522
    Feedback Score
    2 (75%)
    Quote Originally Posted by OldState View Post
    “Flagship” doesn’t mean their absolute best.
    That's exactly what flagship means friend.

    Quote Originally Posted by OldState View Post
    After all their current flagship is the plain 6920.
    Well, that's the problem/biggest criticism isn't it?
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaykayyy
    And to the guys whining about spending more on training, and relying less on the hardware, you just sound like your [sic] trying to make yourself feel superior.

  7. #217
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,659
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Esq. View Post
    I'll buy FN's if I need an M4 type rifle-- they are an M4 supplier to Uncle Sam who meets all the TDP as well.
    Very clearly you have not looked closely at what they are selling for AR-15s on the commercial market.

    If they were pulling mil rifles off the line with semi auto fire control groups it would be different.

    But that's not what they're doing.

    Likewise the large pin stuff says more about what the ATF required manufacturers to do at the time then conscious Colt decisions.

    Same reason the H&K 91 was was irreversibly modified relative to G3s. It's not just using semi FCGs. They were forced to neuter them to be able to sell as semis.

    Now with both Colt and H&K derivatives it's more relaxed. But at the time those changes were required.

    Anyone who has a "good riddance" mindset to a manufacturer stopping selling products to firearms owners is very short-sighted. I'll even include Ruger in that.

  8. #218
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,096
    Feedback Score
    0
    FN barrels seem to be well regarded, both civilian and .mil.

  9. #219
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    401
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Seems like there's a few folks who let their irritation with Colt's business practices color their opinions on the quality of the product.

    It's pretty arguable that they have crapped on the consumer market in favor of the government contract arena, and they've completely failed to innovate in the rifle arena they once owned. Perfectly justifiable reasons to not buy IMO.

    But that doesn't mean that the 6920 is magically a piece of shit, either. Good bang for the buck.

    More guns for more people is more gooder.

  10. #220
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    12,145
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by nick84 View Post
    Seems like there's a few folks who let their irritation with Colt's business practices color their opinions on the quality of the product.

    It's pretty arguable that they have crapped on the consumer market in favor of the government contract arena, and they've completely failed to innovate in the rifle arena they once owned. Perfectly justifiable reasons to not buy IMO.

    But that doesn't mean that the 6920 is magically a piece of shit, either. Good bang for the buck.

    More guns for more people is more gooder.
    Agreed.

    It’s also their lack of marketing. Gun owners fall for the dumbest advertising. Everyone wants to be tacticool, just as long as it doesn’t involve lacing up some Bates. Specs don’t get people excited the same way that shiny FDE rails and laser engraved triggers do.

    The great irony in the above is that you cannot juxtapose a “boring” 6920 against a flashy Geissele without mentioning that nearly 100% of bad guys killed with carbines in the hands of Americans over the 20 years of nearly continuous combat have had “Colt” stamped on the side.

    The reason those rifles were in the sandbox in the first place isn’t because their CEO is a good businessman or even because “Colt” itself is an inherently good manufacturer of weapons. It’s because the rifles meet specifications that have been tweaked and perfected over the last 50 years.

    People can hate Colt all the want. Many of the arguments are valid. They don’t innovate at all. They don’t care about the civilian market. But you can’t say a Colt 6920 doesn’t work. Because a Colt M4 works, and as Pinz mentioned, the Colt 6920 is an M4 with a different trigger group and a 1.5” longer barrel.
    Last edited by Eurodriver; 09-18-19 at 18:10.

Page 22 of 45 FirstFirst ... 12202122232432 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •