Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: HK to upgrade British SA80 rifles - again.

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,984
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MountainRaven View Post
    AFAIK, the manufacturer (RSAF-Enfield) of the SA80 is out of business, which is why the UK had to get H&K to do the A2 upgrades in the first place. So the life of the SA80 is finite at this point, anyway.
    At the time RSAF actually owned HK during the A2 upgrade. HK had recently been sold mostly because of the failure of the G11 to be adopted after German reunification created many financial hardships for the country. Other projects such as the OICW that involved heavy R&D costs and were ultimately not adopted also led to the sale of H&K.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    511
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly View Post
    Technically, so was Glock. And Glocks are awesome.
    Yeah but the Glock wasn't designed by a British ground forces committee, which, as far as I know, have a pretty long history of goofy stuff.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    SWMT
    Posts
    8,188
    Feedback Score
    32 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    At the time RSAF actually owned HK during the A2 upgrade. HK had recently been sold mostly because of the failure of the G11 to be adopted after German reunification created many financial hardships for the country. Other projects such as the OICW that involved heavy R&D costs and were ultimately not adopted also led to the sale of H&K.
    I believe it was BAE that owned H&K at the time of the A2 program: That BAE was awarded the A2 contract because they're British and BAE basically bought H&K just for the A2 upgrade program.

    Quote Originally Posted by boltcatch View Post
    Yeah but the Glock wasn't designed by a British ground forces committee, which, as far as I know, have a pretty long history of goofy stuff.
    In point of fact, I believe that Gaston Glock (and his engineers) went to and spoke with as many small arms experts as they could find while developing their pistol, and they studied existing pistol designs.

    Moreover, the Glock pistol is engineered to be simple and easy to manufacture using (then) modern manufacturing techniques, everything else is secondary to that mechanical simplicity. It's sort of like the AK or the AR-15, in that the design has an overarching requirement and everything else flows naturally from that one point.

    The SA80 did not have an overarching requirement beyond, "bullpup AR-18 (without paying Sterling or ArmaLite any licensing fees)". In fact, Sterling was so put off by the SA80's development, that they literally made a bullpup conversion AR-18... which was reputed to have worked better than the RSAF SA80.

    ETA: I believe Ian McCollum did a video on the Sterling AR-18 bullpup, but I'm not finding it.
    Last edited by MountainRaven; 09-18-19 at 22:19.
    " Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
    - Samuel Adams -

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,984
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MountainRaven View Post
    I believe it was BAE that owned H&K at the time of the A2 program: That BAE was awarded the A2 contract because they're British and BAE basically bought H&K just for the A2 upgrade program.
    I think you might be right about BAE, but there was a reason HK was even for sale. I think the other potential buyer was GIAT. And yeah, the A2 upgrade was the biggest reason for them buying HK.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    A Little Here And A Little There
    Posts
    3,231
    Feedback Score
    82 (100%)
    Well, the only good thing about this weapon is that the Brits were never able to inflict it on the rest of the world.
    People make a big deal out of the US forcing .308 on NATO, but at least some decent weapons came out of that deal....
    "Once we get some iron in our souls, we'll get some iron in our hands..."

    "...A rapid, aggressive response will let you get away with some pretty audacious things if you are willing to be mean, fast, and naked."-Failure2Stop

    "The Right can meme; the Left can organize. I guess now we know which one is important." - Random internet comment

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,984
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jellybean View Post
    Well, the only good thing about this weapon is that the Brits were never able to inflict it on the rest of the world.
    People make a big deal out of the US forcing .308 on NATO, but at least some decent weapons came out of that deal....
    Hard to say if the EM2 would have developed into a viable weapon or not. Certainly the L1A1 served the UK well but I think that was a big part of going to a compact weapon system like the L85A1 / SA80, people were tired of lugging that big boat of a rifle around so I can see where everybody that "anything else" might be an improvement.

    It's also ironic that the FAMAS seemed to have been mostly successful even though features and ergonomics would tend to favor the SA80. Obviously a big part of the problem is cost cutting a complex weapon design. Even the Aussies managed to fuxor a proven system by trying to produce a cost effective AUG.

    And along those lines, we've all seen crap grade ARs so you can literally screw up any weapon system design. I bet if HK or Steyr built an SA80 type weapon from the ground up it would run like a clock.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •