Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 37

Thread: NECRO'd: FED having to put money into the overnight repo market?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,851
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Yield curve meaning when short term Treasury yields pay more than longer term. An inverted curve on these definitely has precedence in recession predicting.

    I can see the 2030 area time frame being problematic in economic terms. As in another deep recession.

    Hell, FromMyColdDeadHand, if you and I could juuuust time the market...

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    171
    Feedback Score
    0
    Here's another article with an interesting perspective...

    https://seekingalpha.com/article/429...mail_rec=false

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,442
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by horseman234 View Post
    Here's another article with an interesting perspective...

    https://seekingalpha.com/article/429...mail_rec=false

    Well that’ll scare the crap out of you. I barely follow it, I think I get the general idea, it’s kind of like they’re saying the Fed is a pilot of an airplane who is not quite sure which way the controls move the airplane.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Somewhere in the æther
    Posts
    3,017
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    Well that’ll scare the crap out of you. I barely follow it, I think I get the general idea, it’s kind of like they’re saying the Fed is a pilot of an airplane who is not quite sure which way the controls move the airplane.
    Scarier, even. ^That’s the best case scenario.

    Worst case- it’s a pilot who has seen trouble ahead for a long time, will not admit or correct course but instead decides to stear into it knowingly, instead of correcting the course when eminent disaster is approaching and there is still hope and admitting mistakes made that lead to the trouble in the first place.

    A better example would be an apartment building.

    Structurally it is defective, but instead of rectifying the issue, you just keep building on top of it and adding temporary band aid fixes that will keep the building standing for a little while longer while you can squeeze as much profit from the tenants all the while knowing it will lead to a much worse catastrophic failure.

    If they would fix the problem now, some people would be hurt and profit lost, corrections would be made and time would heal the wounds- but if you keep it going for as long as possible you can make a killing; sure more people will be hurt and some will die even, but you can run away with all that $$$ and do it all over, again and again...
    Last edited by THCDDM4; 09-26-19 at 00:39.
    We interrupt this programme to bring you an important news bulletin: the suspect in the Happy Times All-Girl Glee Club slaying has fled the scene and has managed to elude the police. He is armed and dangerous, and has been spotted in the West Side area, armed with a meat cleaver in one hand and his genitals in the other...

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NH/PA
    Posts
    930
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    That is some crazy stuff there. A lot of money was passed just to keep this country afloat?
    Buy It Cheap!
    Stack It Deep!

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,659
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    There was a decent Forbes or Fortune article on this yesterday. Explained it without fear-mongering.

    Also points out that any easing (money printing) is quickly offset by tightening (absorption). so it's not like the large-scale quantitative-easing, but does temporarily increase the money supply to keep things flowing.

    The anomaly is that some banks are willing to pay way higher interest than you would expect. Which implies something is wrong.

    The assumption is that some very large banks are under capitalized, with some evidence.

    Also it points out the weirdness of those financial transactions in general because at any given time that money is technically owned by two or more entities. Could be as high as 3.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    684
    Feedback Score
    0
    So, this is a rabbit hole, but intriguing. Apparently Deutsche Bank is close to insolvency and about to declare bankruptcy. The overnight rate shot up to 10% last week. My understanding, maybe incorrect?, is that banks lend to each other overnight. However, there is an unnamed bank that other banks see as to risky to loan to even at a 10% rate. It’s well known that Deutsche is in trouble. Question is how much? They have $49 trillion in notional derivatives exposure. These should be cross covered/hedged. But what percent isn’t?

    What if Deutsche Bank had a massive short position in oil and the oil spike from the Saudi attack caused a margin call on Deustche bank and broke the camels back?


    The other suspect bank is Commerzbank. Haven’t done much research on them yet.

    For some reason the dollar has been strengthing despite the repo market operations. Doesn’t make much sense to me, unless there is major trouble brewing elsewhere.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,442
    Feedback Score
    0
    Patriot- that is an interesting theory on D-bank. That would be the classic reason for the problem.

    In 2005 and 2007 when we were looking at buying a house, I knew that there was an issue. We even rented because I said "It isn't a housing market, it is a suicide pact". After the GFC I was pissed that I knew that there was a problem, but I couldn't figure out how to make money. Outside of shorting the stock market, what is the concentrated play that makes money off of this?
    Last edited by FromMyColdDeadHand; 09-27-19 at 06:20.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    171
    Feedback Score
    0
    Here is another interesting article from Zero Hedge. I believe the Russian economist Kondratiev was substantially correct is his assessment of debt waves, but the economy is far to complex with a myriad of outside factors, to establish any definite timelines.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-...devastating-us

    And here is a graph from Jurrien Timmer at Fidelity showing the correlation between working age adults and interest rates. I apologize to those not on Twitter, but I can't seem to get the image to copy from Twitter to the forum.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFQIFO4X...pg&name=medium

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,851
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Deutsche Bank has been "reported" to be in trouble for the past five yrs.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •