I've never seen someone attack, impugn, and threaten the people that you are trying to convince to do something. Great sales technique.
Did Roberts just slap the dems/Nadler for attacking the Senate?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
I've never seen someone attack, impugn, and threaten the people that you are trying to convince to do something. Great sales technique.
Did Roberts just slap the dems/Nadler for attacking the Senate?
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Senior Member
He slapped both Nadler and the Counsel for the President, Pat Cipollone. Kind of "conduct unbecoming" on the Senate Floor, referring to some 1905 incident involving an accusation of "Pettifogging".Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand
Maj. USAR (Ret) 160th SOAR, 2/17 CAV
NRA Life Member
Black Mesa Ranch. Raising Fine Cattle and Horses in San Miguel County since 1879
Senior Member
Imagine if Congress worked this late and hard on everything they did...
Experience is a cruel teacher, gives the exam first and then the lesson.
Senior Member
Hunter Biden also can't tell you anything about the energy business, Ukraine or why he got paid so much.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Senior Member
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/...trump-ukraine/
Classic Roberts. Watch the CNN clip. So Nadler goes full retard and Cipolione calls him for it and Roberts chastises both sides 'equally'. So raping someone is as bad as pointing out that somoneone is raping you------ right. Not saying the GOP and surely not Trump are always chaste and pure in thought, but once again we see Roberts taking the concept of non-partisanship and screwing over the conservative side. Funny how that seems to be a trend. A good thing- and the dems knew how it would play out- that using Roberts as a screen for calling witnesses was voted down. Roberts needs to do the right thing instead of worrying about if it looks like he is doing the 'right' thing that will make him popular with the cool kids. He worries about if the game will be judged to be fair, so he manipulates the ball and strike calls.
Schiff must be a moron to think that having the Whistleblower testify would turnout well.
https://www.realclearinvestigations....mp_121701.html
Last edited by FromMyColdDeadHand; 01-22-20 at 07:45.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Site Sponsor
The house didn't do their job, they were in too much of a hurry and now they want the Senate to do the work of the House.
I'm not surprised, just a bit aghast at the amount of ego it must take for Schiff and Nadler to attempt this BS. Roberts is no conservative, he's not even unbiased in the way he is handling this. he could clearly just say, "This isn't the way this works, nice try, but No."
I don't see this going anywhere, but it is saying a lot about how they intend to flagrantly choose to break the rules and expect everyone to go along with it.
Roberts is useless.
Senior Member
https://www.realclearinvestigations....mp_121701.html
Oh, so swampy. The whole whistleblower issue is so incestuous that even people from Kentucky find it dirty. We knew that the whistleblower was dirty, the level of corruption is amazing. I thought the whistleblower had gamed the system, in reality, it was a fixed game from the start.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Site Sponsor
If even 33% of the things discussed in this article are true, it is clearly an “anti” agenda.
ETC (SW/AW), USN (1998-2008)
CVN-65, USS Enterprise
Senior Member
So now three days of what we have already heard? The defense might be more interesting since it is new viewpoints.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Site Sponsor
What a $h-t show.
This is simply embarrassing for the country.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks