Page 99 of 146 FirstFirst ... 4989979899100101109 ... LastLast
Results 981 to 990 of 1457

Thread: Impeachment

  1. #981
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,446
    Feedback Score
    0
    No, the Dems want this over with, not a rolling cascade of articles. Another set of articles just begs why they weren't included in the first.

    Let's take a step back and realize why this shit show is happening to the Dems.

    William Barr

    Saint Barr, Barr the Destroyer, Barr the patron saint of Constitutional Law, the best AG of the past 100 years Barr none.

    He blunted the attack of the Mueller report with his initial appraisal, which to be discredited would need to be factually found false- and the Dems couldn't do that. The Mueller report going to be a hand-off to the Dems and T-ball impeachment. BARRed.

    DO people realize that the Ukrainian attack is a DOJ-FBI-CIA-NSA hit job? Obviously the FBI-NSA-CIA part is pretty clear, but realize that the charges against Gulianin's Ukrainian friends were part of it. Imagine if Trump hadn't released the transcript. We would have been sitting on the Whistleblowers version of events, everyone looking side-eye at Rudy, and then two of his buddies, Ukrainian buddies get pinched. While releasing the transcript helped, what really helped was that when the crim referral went to DOJ on the quid-pro-quo, Barr did two things. One he squashed any kind of direct DOJ investigation and he didn't recuse himself. Sessions would have cucked out because the AG position is mentioned in the call too. BARRed again.

    You can look at the current dem dilemma and wonder how they dealt themselves such a weak hand- they didn't they got BARRed.

    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  2. #982
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    4,665
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by OH58D View Post
    So if the President is acquitted in the Senate, what is stopping the dems from starting the Impeachment process again? Does Double Jeopardy apply? If's he's re-elected, are we going to see just a non-stop attempt at impeachment? It's like the old saying: "If you throw enough shit on the wall, some of it will stick".

    At some point this has got to stop.
    I would say common sense would stop them, but that certainly doesn't apply in this case.

    They will have to lose big time in 2020 for them to understand the situation they have put themselves in and stop this nonsense. However, many/most of the sheep that vote straight (D) don't care about what is right or wrong and are continuing the support for this.

    No evidence for Russia? Don't care, impeach. No evidence for the Ukrainian aid being withheld? Don't care, impeach. No evidence of abuse of power? Don't care, impeach. No evidence of treason or high crimes and misdemeanors? Don't care, they'll find something at the impeachment trial.

    And Pravda just leads them on with their false reporting and extreme spin on everything.
    Experience is a cruel teacher, gives the exam first and then the lesson.

  3. #983
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,930
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by OH58D View Post
    So if the President is acquitted in the Senate, what is stopping the dems from starting the Impeachment process again? Does Double Jeopardy apply? If's he's re-elected, are we going to see just a non-stop attempt at impeachment? It's like the old saying: "If you throw enough shit on the wall, some of it will stick".

    At some point this has got to stop.
    Don't be shocked when we find out they're already working on the next set of "facts" with which to claim Trump should be impeached again. Until Trump goes scorched earth on Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler, it's going to continue. He has to burn their village down or it will never stop.

    Honestly, I'd flood San Francisco with federal agents and arrest everyone who so much as looked like a felon or an illegal. I'd fly to San Francisco and make a public speech every Friday at 5pm, until I so overtaxed their resources they fold like a cheap suit. I'd hold my pressers at the front gate of her compound. I'd send the IRS to audit every last one of her major donors. Every Monday morning I'd show images of bums pissing and crapping in the streets in SF, and IV drug users passed out in public areas. I'd throw so much heat on her that she swooned from it.

    I would make it my life's work to see to it she was either unwilling or incapable of continuing her tenure in Congress. Then I'd ask her replacement if they felt like a lucky punk?
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  4. #984
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13,549
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    You literally could have impeached Bush but didn’t and now are trying to impeach Trump on essentially rumors, hearsay, and personal feelings.

  5. #985
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    The Sticks, TN
    Posts
    4,183
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Don’t like how President Trump combs his hair? Impeach! Don’t like the fake tan? Impeach! He took an extra mint from the office mint bowl? Impeach! He talked confidentially to his lawyer? Impeach! Yeah, we got him in a corner now!
    Philippians 2:10-11

    To argue with a person who renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. ~ Thomas Paine

    “The greatest conspiracy theory is the notion that your government cares about you”- unknown.

  6. #986
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,635
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by OH58D View Post
    So if the President is acquitted in the Senate, what is stopping the dems from starting the Impeachment process again?
    Loosing the House.

    Quote Originally Posted by OH58D View Post
    Does Double Jeopardy apply?
    No.

    Quote Originally Posted by OH58D View Post
    If's he's re-elected, are we going to see just a non-stop attempt at impeachment?
    Probably yes, unless the Dems loose the House. They are already talking about it, in public, in front of cameras, without any hint of shame.

  7. #987
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    242
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    No, the Dems want this over with, not a rolling cascade of articles. Another set of articles just begs why they weren't included in the first.

    Let's take a step back and realize why this shit show is happening to the Dems.

    William Barr

    Saint Barr, Barr the Destroyer, Barr the patron saint of Constitutional Law, the best AG of the past 100 years Barr none.

    He blunted the attack of the Mueller report with his initial appraisal, which to be discredited would need to be factually found false- and the Dems couldn't do that. The Mueller report going to be a hand-off to the Dems and T-ball impeachment. BARRed.

    DO people realize that the Ukrainian attack is a DOJ-FBI-CIA-NSA hit job? Obviously the FBI-NSA-CIA part is pretty clear, but realize that the charges against Gulianin's Ukrainian friends were part of it. Imagine if Trump hadn't released the transcript. We would have been sitting on the Whistleblowers version of events, everyone looking side-eye at Rudy, and then two of his buddies, Ukrainian buddies get pinched. While releasing the transcript helped, what really helped was that when the crim referral went to DOJ on the quid-pro-quo, Barr did two things. One he squashed any kind of direct DOJ investigation and he didn't recuse himself. Sessions would have cucked out because the AG position is mentioned in the call too. BARRed again.

    You can look at the current dem dilemma and wonder how they dealt themselves such a weak hand- they didn't they got BARRed.

    Bill Barr is no savior. His job is to clean up what we already know, that which is public. Comey,McCabe,Rosenstein,Mueller,Strozk,Baker,Page, The Ohrs...etc. Not a single one of them will spend a single day defending themselves in court.
    Bill Barr ran the DoJ's investigation into Ruby Ridge...ZERO time served for an government employee. Barr is a Spook, his dad was a Spook and he is busy telling the FBI and DoJ to burn the paperwork. How many more times will the FBI retroactively classify information? Rank and file...come on man. Barr is busy saving the instututions, not the American People.

  8. #988
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,281
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Seriously the Dims have lost it, looks like they plan on impeaching the POTUS for treason.

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ltimate-crime/
    “The Trump Doctrine is ‘We’re America, Bitch.’ That’s the Trump Doctrine.”

    "He is free to evade reality, he is free to unfocus his mind and stumble blindly down any road he pleases, but not free to avoid the abyss he refuses to see."

  9. #989
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,485
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mack7.62 View Post
    Seriously the Dims have lost it, looks like they plan on impeaching the POTUS for treason.

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ltimate-crime/
    That's rich, accusing him of THEIR crime...
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  10. #990
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,446
    Feedback Score
    0
    Lots of treason talk in there, mentioned 41 times. Like when Leonidias wishes that the Persians would kill him during the truce, we can only hope that they are stupid enough to charge him with treason. Probably more of a throw away line to show that they aren’t ‘crazy’.

    He’ll’ buy the standard that I skimmed in their doc, it would have been a slam dunk case to charge Obama with treason over all the cash he gave Iran...
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

Page 99 of 146 FirstFirst ... 4989979899100101109 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •