Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Common Use

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Divided States of America
    Posts
    1,186
    Feedback Score
    0

    Common Use

    With so many AR type rifles having already been sold, continuing to being sold, and owned, does "common use" have any significant impact on passing future restrictions?
    Big brother is watching...and listening.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    6,738
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by prepare View Post
    With so many AR type rifles having already been sold, continuing to being sold, and owned, does "common use" have any significant impact on passing future restrictions?
    Common use should cause DDs, sbrs and machineguns to be removed from the nfa.
    Both are extremely common and the standard rifle for militaries world-wide.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    3,434
    Feedback Score
    0
    Can't be in common use if banned.

    Much like the term I/we/they won't disarm law abiding citizens. If it is illegal then citizens are no longer law abiding.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    12,696
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    You think reality matters to people working in shifts to kerp you fat, weak, ignorant, disarmed, and voiceless?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,793
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    What Firefly said.

    ARs are 100% in common use, it's not even debatable among rational people, but have you noticed what insanity becomes doctrine on the left these days?
    ____________________________________________________________________________________
    Use InfoGalactic instead of Wikipedia - avoid Wikipedia's left bias

    https://infogalactic.com/info/Main_Page
    ____________________________________________________________________________________

    Product reviews stating "Only 4 stars because I haven't used it yet" are an idiot's signature.
    ____________________________________________________________________________________

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Divided States of America
    Posts
    1,186
    Feedback Score
    0
    My question was does common use have any bearing on restrictions?
    Big brother is watching...and listening.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    6,738
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by prepare View Post
    My question was does common use have any bearing on restrictions?
    Some BS precedent set by the supreme court iirc. You cant ban stuff in common use, but the government says **** the constitution, we’ll ban what we want.

    Imo it was a weak move by the SC to look like they were “keeping the other branches in check.”

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    10,406
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    It’s still flawed logic. Since common use constraints permit pre-emptive banning of of widgets that otherwise simply haven’t proliferated due to tech advancements or whatever.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    “Answer The Bell...” J.W.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    12,696
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Why is it half the country just wants to chill after a hard day’s work, make love to their GF/power bottom, play retro video games, raise children, and live life while the other half is almost demanding guys to put on tiger stripes with necklaces made from the ears of communist heathens or don Hawaiian shirts, cook white MC booty shorts and NODs and not even boogaloo, not even hootenanny, but go full on Box Social with pyres of dead illuminating the night’s sky?


    Like I’m good either way, I just wanna know why

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    377
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by prepare View Post
    My question was does common use have any bearing on restrictions?
    Several instances in DC v. Heller

    "We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those “in common use at the time.” 307 U. S., at 179. We think
    that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of “dangerous and unusual weapons.” "

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •