Found this kind of interesting. I could see where this might be bad.
Potential flaw in law regarding AR-15s exposed
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/11/us/ar...nvs/index.html
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Found this kind of interesting. I could see where this might be bad.
Potential flaw in law regarding AR-15s exposed
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/11/us/ar...nvs/index.html
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
The price of liberty is, always has been, and always will be blood: The person who is not willing to die for his liberty has already lost it to the first scoundrel who is willing to risk dying to violate that person's liberty! Are you free?
--- Andrew Ford
Basically to paraphrase, in one case the judge ruled that a AR15 lower reciever does not meet definition of firearm.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
The price of liberty is, always has been, and always will be blood: The person who is not willing to die for his liberty has already lost it to the first scoundrel who is willing to risk dying to violate that person's liberty! Are you free?
--- Andrew Ford
It reads as if the Judge ruled that, because a lower does not contain a breechlock, firing mechanism, and is not threaded to accept a barrel, it does not meet the definition of a firearm. It seems the same could be said of many modern firearms, including most semi-automatic handguns and the majority of semi-automatic rifles.
Not the first time the feds don't appeal or have dropped a case to keep pro 2A rulings from advancing forward
Must be the same BS logic that let Eric "Gunwalker" Holder skate.
- Either you're part of the problem or you're part of the solution or you're just part of the landscape - Sam (Robert DeNiro) in, "Ronin" -
I’m glad someone else read this and thought, “Not good for gun owners.”
Last edited by Tx_Aggie; 10-15-19 at 14:48.
Bookmarks