Has anyone using Law Tactical folding stock adapter found it desirable to use a different buffer weight than they were using previously due to the increased mass of the BCG via the bolt carrier extension?
Has anyone using Law Tactical folding stock adapter found it desirable to use a different buffer weight than they were using previously due to the increased mass of the BCG via the bolt carrier extension?
Gettin' down innagrass.
Let's Go Brandon!
Can't help you with that. If you are going folding stock then go for the deadfoot arms stock. Works great as about same weight as oem. I don't have any ties to this but this thing is great. More expensive. ..yes...but we'll worth it .
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
Oh yeah been out for several years I think. Great service 100 percent satisfaction on the part transferable. Great bunch of guys. Shoots folded and to me the recoil is more subdued.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
https://deadfootarms.com
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
You can get two law folders for that price. I'm sure it's great quality, and If you need to shoot it folded, it looks like a great option. I jumped into this thread because I was interested to see what other pistol AR guys are running for springs and buffers. But thanks for giving me info on dead foot.
98% Sarcastic. 100% Overthinking things and making up reasons for buying a new firearm.
Uep I under stand the cost. I thought long and hard. I like the idea of having folded in compact package and being able to shoot in that configuration. Plus if I ever find I don't like it. Full refund. What's not to like. Lol.... jmho
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
I haven't assembled it yet, but I have an A5H1 for it, since the extra 2oz carrier extension puts the effective buffer mass between A5H3 and 4. The build works fine with the 4 and Sprinco green, as tested without the Law.
Sent from my ZTE A2017U using Tapatalk
Bookmarks