If the 44 is priced right,has a decent trigger and proves to be reliable and accurate, I think it should do fine. Dad getting one of these for a first pistol for his son, and him liking it, means their is a good chance with him getting some Glock centerfire pistol down the line.
We need all the young people we can get in the shooting sports today.
Last edited by Biggy; 12-20-19 at 07:52.
I understand making it exactly like a G19.
But, I would have done a glock frame with something like a mk IV barrel/ bolt so a red dot could be fixed on it.
Then slide weight wouldnt be an issue and all sorts of barrel lengths could be available.
Something approximating a 34 barrel length would be sweet.
Yes, I want a SW 41. Maybe have it finished in something rust proof.
“It's no wonder that truth is stranger than fiction. Fiction has to make sense.” Mark Twain
As much as I like the MK IV, it's in no way competitive against my old 41. The 41 is not nearly as simple to disassemble/reassemble as the MK IV, but it's much better than all MKs that came before it. The BuckMark's not annoying, but needing tools to do it is far from ideal.
I agree that basing Glock's rimfire off of a best selling model makes a lot more sense than off of one that's not.
Back in the day I shot a lot with a guy that let me use his 5.5" 41. The grip fit my hand like a glove.
The price has always been more than I wanted to spend.
“It's no wonder that truth is stranger than fiction. Fiction has to make sense.” Mark Twain
A Glock 44 as accurate as a Buckmark or Ruger Mk 4 ain’t gonna happen.
Hint: loose barrel versus fixed barrels. 3 inches at 25 yards is more likely. Trainer, yes. Hunting or trail gun, no.
Bookmarks