The PTR-32: When you want a 7.62x39 that weighs as much as a 7.62x51.
Not saying that PTD-32s aren’t nice, but if I’m going to carry a gun that heavy, I’d prefer it be a full-power 7.62 NATO rifle.
" Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
- Samuel Adams -
I wonder if the Bren 2 wouldn't also fit the title of, 7.62x39mm Rolls-Royce, especially since GIGN - who could have had pretty much literally anything in 7.62x39 or 300 BLK - went with the Bren 2.
(I'm guessing, and this is just a guess, that they chose the Bren 2 over the 553R because of the straight-in magazines and the bolt hold-open.)
" Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
- Samuel Adams -
I haven't shot the CZ, but GIGN is a good recommendation.
Could be, but it would be hard to beat the build quality of the 55X series rifles. I’d buy a Bren 2 in 7.62x39, but the magazines are a definite no go for me. The last thing I’d want is another proprietary magazine. If I could get a 7.62x39 that would take AR15 mags, I’d go with it. This is obviously not an issue for GIGN.
Last edited by Bret; 12-29-19 at 14:13.
I just watched MAC video on on the Bren 2 7.62x39 and since it takes a proprietary magazine, it takes it off the table for me.
Bookmarks