Quote Originally Posted by alx01 View Post
These are bold and broad statements regarding piston ARs in general and LWRC in particular.

Are you saying you're against HK416/417 and LMT piston implementations (and a few others)? Are you saying it based on a personal preference/experience or a validated technical merit?

What was/is wrong with LWRC? They have their own manufacturing facilities producing lots of components in house including barrels and plastics. Not really a fly by night operation, I think. They seem to serve the same market segment as KAC from the consumer and possibly a mil perspective. Neither is my cup of tea, but that's purely a personal preference.

Is there some issue with LWRC people are generally not aware of?
It’s his shtick. Mention LWRC and he loses all professionalism in posting, like a trigger word.