Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 84

Thread: Fudds Vs Gun grabbers

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,907
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)

    Fudds Vs Gun grabbers

    Which is worse? Fudd's are defacto gun grabbers, but you know what I/m saying here.

    I find the Fudd irritates me worse then the straight "all guns are bad" gun grabbers. I got into it with one recently, and that statement like "I own guns and go hunting every year but there's some guns people really should not have" and blah blah makes me wanna reach through the screen and choke the chit out of them.

    The gun grabbers are just ignorant turds or commies etc,, but the Fudd's, they just take it to another level of failure as human beings for me.

    Which do you find more worthless and why?
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    473
    Feedback Score
    0
    Both are equally useless vermin that serve no utility; fudds are the enemy within.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    1,189
    Feedback Score
    0
    Fudds are the worst.

    At least the other side you can count on. You know exactly where they stand.

    Fudds are just back stabbers.

    I think they a bigger threat.

    Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
    The price of liberty is, always has been, and always will be blood: The person who is not willing to die for his liberty has already lost it to the first scoundrel who is willing to risk dying to violate that person's liberty! Are you free?
    --- Andrew Ford

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,907
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 223to45 View Post
    Fudds are the worst.

    At least the other side you can count on. You know exactly where they stand.

    Fudds are just back stabbers.

    I think they a bigger threat.

    Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
    My least favorite of them all, the military Fudd. It's astounding how many in the mil or ex mil are Fudd's and for gun control. None that I know personally, but it's common to see. Guy I was talking to did 25 years in the mil.

    What the actual % of mil are Fudd's I don't know, but that they exist at all blow my mind.

    Maybe some of the mil members can explain that one to me.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    746
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    My least favorite of them all, the military Fudd. It's astounding how many in the mil or ex mil are Fudd's and for gun control. None that I know personally, but it's common to see. Guy I was talking to did 25 years in the mil.

    What the actual % of mil are Fudd's I don't know, but that they exist at all blow my mind.

    Maybe some of the mil members can explain that one to me.
    Just got in an argument with one of those ex-military Fudds at work today. I was talking about the CO officer that had the red flag law against him after a justified on-duty shooting. The red flag case was filed by the mother of the 19 year old the LEO shot after being attacked with a knife. This co-worker states, “It was only a knife, all he had to do was keep backing up and taze him.” Then went on to say “I don’t care if a cop looses his gun rights if it just saves one life.” Here’s the kicker, he and I are both LEOS, and he is even a firearms instructor and on our version of a SWAT team!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,492
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by john armond View Post
    Just got in an argument with one of those ex-military Fudds at work today. I was talking about the CO officer that had the red flag law against him after a justified on-duty shooting. The red flag case was filed by the mother of the 19 year old the LEO shot after being attacked with a knife. This co-worker states, “It was only a knife, all he had to do was keep backing up and taze him.” Then went on to say “I don’t care if a cop looses his gun rights if it just saves one life.” Here’s the kicker, he and I are both LEOS, and he is even a firearms instructor and on our version of a SWAT team!
    How clueless can some people be? The human body is simply NOT BUILT to move backwards at high speed--by the time you've given three feet of ground in retreat he's advanced at least six.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    746
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    How clueless can some people be? The human body is simply NOT BUILT to move backwards at high speed--by the time you've given three feet of ground in retreat he's advanced at least six.
    Coming from someone who also is a DT instructor is actually pretty scary.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,857
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by john armond View Post
    Just got in an argument with one of those ex-military Fudds at work today. I was talking about the CO officer that had the red flag law against him after a justified on-duty shooting. The red flag case was filed by the mother of the 19 year old the LEO shot after being attacked with a knife. This co-worker states, “It was only a knife, all he had to do was keep backing up and taze him.” Then went on to say “I don’t care if a cop looses his gun rights if it just saves one life.” Here’s the kicker, he and I are both LEOS, and he is even a firearms instructor and on our version of a SWAT team!
    While I don't support the lack of due process in general, having it applied like this may ultimately be a good thing since some officers (your co-worker excluded) may get off the fence (or full support) since they have skin in the game instead of an exemption.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    746
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    He will never get it, doesn’t seem to believe the general public should be able to have guns, and probably thinks mine should be taken away because I disagree with him. Unfortunately I see at least some aspect of this in a bunch of people at work. Most of them, like this one, are rabid anti Trump people. Of course none of them complain about their retirement investments and pay rising way more than when the last guy was in office.
    Last edited by john armond; 01-16-20 at 18:46.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Not in a gun friendly state
    Posts
    3,809
    Feedback Score
    0
    Fudds are the worst. If gun grabbers are the enemy, fudds are collaborators. The worst thing about fudds is that they seek out gun stores and gun owners who own "evil" guns in order to let them know about the disdain they have for their weapons. In all my years in gun sales, I never had any loudmouth, commie, social justice warrior come in and start shit about us selling guns. However, I DID have more than a few stuck up fudds come into the store for no other reason than to chastise us for selling the ugly black plastic guns. They almost always said the same things: Nobody needed these stupid "assault guns"; guns are for hunting deer and birds, not people. Plus, ARs are ugly and no self-respecting gun owner would ever blemish his collection with that plastic hunk of junk. And, of course, everybody should be carrying revolvers, and if you learned to make those six shots count, you wouldn't need a high capacity 'clip' in a semiauto that's just going to jam anyway.
    Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who do not.-Ben Franklin

    there’s some good in this world, Mr. Frodo. And it’s worth fighting for.-Samwise Gamgee

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •