I've heard it said that a cheapo optic in 2020 is not the same as a cheapo optic of, say, 10 or 15 years ago. Guess manufacturing technology has brought up overall quality, although there's still a lot of junk out there.
I've heard it said that a cheapo optic in 2020 is not the same as a cheapo optic of, say, 10 or 15 years ago. Guess manufacturing technology has brought up overall quality, although there's still a lot of junk out there.
I like LMT's MLOK upper generally speaking, but it seems like it kinda of defeats one of its own purposes with the fact that the barrel is not easily removable unless you remove the accessories from the slots. Especially when the older MRP didn't have that issue.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who do not.-Ben Franklin
there’s some good in this world, Mr. Frodo. And it’s worth fighting for.-Samwise Gamgee
The tradeoff is having the greatest feeling handguard in the hand I've felt to date + all the myriad of other gained benefits going with a one piece 7075 chassis for an upper.
The MLR and MLC feels so amazing in the hands. I would hate for them to change the profile to account for barrel changes with MLOK kit still installed.
That being said, I have a couple of Sig Romeo 4Ts and they are very impressive sights. Very rugged and well built. I love the reticle that features not only a red dot, but also a "circle of death: a la EoTech. I own a bunch of MROs and APs as well, but I have to say I really like these 4Ts.
Have any of LMT's rifles been fielded by our mil?
You won't outvote the corruption.
Sic Semper Tyrannis
What I found interesting in the article was the round counter and associated technology.
That Holosun 509T has me intrigued.
ETC (SW/AW), USN (1998-2008)
CVN-65, USS Enterprise
so who has one?
I do and absolutely love it
Bookmarks