Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 68

Thread: FN scores M4/M4A1 contract

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    4,665
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by RHINOWSO View Post
    Good for FN.

    But I'm sure Colt will still get fed some smaller M4/M4A1 contracts for the DOD and FMS programs, as the Gov't never likes having all it's eggs in one basket when it comes to large programs like this.

    For example from just over a year ago, both FN and Colt got $80M contracts for more M4/M4A1s.

    https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/201...2031541775138/

    And some FMS stuff -

    https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/...ales-contract/

    https://thedefensepost.com/2019/09/2...-13-countries/
    Or they end up as a subcontractor of FN producing M4 parts/complete carbines.

    I recall a few years ago FN had contracted them to produce 240s.
    Experience is a cruel teacher, gives the exam first and then the lesson.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    12,145
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    Just speculation, but as seemingly large as this contract is, it may take the Army to the 6.8mm transition with a large inventory of "just in case" carbines.
    The army is not switching to 6.8.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    49
    Feedback Score
    0
    Colts civilian sale market was very small compared to the gov contracts. They shut it down for that reason.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Eastern PA
    Posts
    1,447
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodriver View Post
    The army is not switching to 6.8.
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OLCL6OYbSTw

    Aren't you USMC..

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,383
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Grand58742 View Post
    Or they end up as a subcontractor of FN producing M4 parts/complete carbines.

    I recall a few years ago FN had contracted them to produce 240s.
    Yeah they all scratch each others back and do business with each other when the situation presents itself.

    Only the non-business minded think that this is the 'death bell' for Colt.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Sea of Japan
    Posts
    1,121
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    Lightbulb

    Quote Originally Posted by prepare View Post
    If Colts out of contracts and no civilian sales whats left?
    Pythons that have to be returned for warranty issues?

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Asheville NC now.
    Posts
    260
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Fn had a contract already with the US gov for m4a1. This is nothing new.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    3,553
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    A surplus lower courtesy of the US Navy. Now in use with US Border Patrol.

    Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
    “The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,092
    Feedback Score
    0
    IIRC, the M16A3 was essentially an A2 with a full auto capability?

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    1,434
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    IIRC, the M16A3 was essentially an A2 with a full auto capability?
    Yes, but the spec could apply to a flat top as well.

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •