I think there are a number of moderates/idiots that also have seen what's been going on the past three years in regards to Trump and are angered by both sides of the equation. Biggest thing to take away from 2016 that can (and probably will) repeat in 2020 is the revolt of the people.
Trump wasn't elected, but more installed by a revolution of the people against the system that had been operating for years. They were fed up with having to pick the bad or worse choice deemed by the elite few in the major parties that controlled such things.
Enter Trump who didn't talk like a politician, didn't act like a politician and moreover, wasn't afraid to rock the political boat. The media as well as both political parties and pundits alike tried everything to destroy him before November 2016. The people saw this and weren't afraid to go against the system and put in a man of questionable character when he clearly wasn't the best "political" choice. The GOP figured it out and let things play out with what the people wanted. The DNC and media still haven't figured it out and keeps attacking him which is going to ensure his reelection.
Again, Bloomberg has way too much political baggage to be a viable choice for moderates. You and I both agree the media will do its best to cover it up, but the reporting on it was done years ago and it's way too easy to give the 30 second paid campaign commercial exposing his idiocy over the years. They aren't going to collect the Bernie vote with Bloomberg, they aren't going to collect the minority vote and they aren't going to gain the Rust Belt vote.
I just don't see Bloomberg pulling in the centrist Republicans or even the independent voters.
Bookmarks