Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 71 to 73 of 73

Thread: Labradar 5.56 data 1168

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,233
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    65*
    G19/PMM Barrel/Comp
    Blue 125 TC, Ginex primers, HS-6
    1.167” COL mixed brass

    6.0
    Av 1107
    Es 133
    Sd 39.8

    6.1
    Av 1125
    Es 61
    Sd 19.4

    6.2
    Av 1135
    Es 88
    Sd 30

    6.3
    Av 1160
    Es 62
    Sd 18.9

    6.4
    Av 1186
    Es 54
    Sd 21

    6.5
    Av 1212
    Es 66
    Sd 22.1

    6.6
    Av 1219
    Es 33
    Sd 9.6

    6.7
    Av 1230
    Es 88
    Sd 22.2

    This shit is loud as ****. All of it cycled, vigorously. I’d say most or all of it had a feel mimicking +p. Mind the COL if you’re thinking about reproducing this. I had a hard time capturing shots reliably because it really made me want to bang away faster than the chrono could keep up.
    Last edited by 1168; 01-08-23 at 19:17.

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mid-West, USA
    Posts
    2,821
    Feedback Score
    63 (100%)
    Those loads ended solidly in +P territory, if I'm reading it correctly. I've used plenty of HS-6 for mild to standard velocities in 9mm and mild to full power loads in 38 Super. I always had good luck with it, though I was using it with jacketed bullets.
    Last edited by opngrnd; 01-08-23 at 19:54.

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,233
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by opngrnd View Post
    Those loads ended solidly in +P territory, if I'm reading it correctly. I've used plenty of HS-6 for mild to standard velocities in 9mm and mild to full power loads in 38 Super. I always had good luck with it, though I was using it with jacketed bullets.
    Thats a really good point. I’m using .355 powdercoated bullets. I got the charge weights from Speer, but my velocities are much higher than they got with plated and jacketed bullets. I seated them long because all of the published data seemed conservative, and I thought I might seek to venture a bit above published charge weights later, to mimic +p loads. But I got what I wanted without doing that.

    A friend of mine that was recording normally loads with TG, but occasionally 244 or CFE-P, and he was like “Did you just say 6.0-6.7?…. Are you sure?”

    Edit: for anyone wondering, this project is to economically drive the comp while mimicking +p recoil. Shoot me a PM to avoid cluttering the thread if you’d like more discussion on this topic.
    Last edited by 1168; 01-28-23 at 14:48.

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •