Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Type 1, Type 2, Type 3 Rant

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,931
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyohte View Post
    Most jargon in the firearms community, and most communities in general, is marketing.
    Filling classes requires a perpetual flow of pretentious bullshit....
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Former USA
    Posts
    3,140
    Feedback Score
    0
    Two immediate actions clear them all in a pistol;
    Tap/rack. If that doesn't work strip magazine, cycle the slide, insert new mag, cycle the slide.
    You won't outvote the corruption.
    Sic Semper Tyrannis

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    Posts
    8,741
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Type classification for stoppages has been around for decades and is nothing new nor is it associated with "tactical" trends. The problem with it over time is that folks redefine them and what one person or place is teaching is different than another. Students learn the term, it's associated conditions, and correction procedure required for that condition. The result is a lack of consistency and permanency as they go on.

    Sometimes, we have to have particular words to call things to enhance communication across a discipline. The balance and sweet-spot for can be elusive though.
    2012 National Zumba Endurance Champion
    الدهون القاع الفتيات لك جعل العالم هزاز جولة الذهاب

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    1,833
    Feedback Score
    21 (100%)
    I first heard type Type 1-3 from Cooper and Smith along with condition 1-3 and a crazy color code of awareness; not really what I would call tacticool guys, but I do think back in the day they over-complicated a lot of things.
    I'm sure many would disagree with me but for several years I have just taught everything gets a tap/rack; if that doesn't fix it unload, check the chamber and reload with a fresh mag which will fix everything except broken parts.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    Posts
    8,741
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Don Robison View Post
    I first heard type Type 1-3 from Cooper and Smith along with condition 1-3 and a crazy color code of awareness; not really what I would call tacticool guys, but I do think back in the day they over-complicated a lot of things. I'm sure many would disagree with me but for several years I have just taught everything gets a tap/rack; if that doesn't fix it unload, check the chamber and reload with a fresh mag which will fix everything except broken parts.
    That's one of the more common things between types, each clearance starts with seating the magazine and attempting to rack the slide. An improperly seated mag or an empty chamber is also the most frequent problem, so that alone works 90% of the time.

    Teaching a reload as a universal correction can also be a thing, and as you say corrects almost everything. Issues are the availability of a spare mag or retention of the magazine in use. (Now, cue the "never hold onto a bad mag", "keep every mag...you'll need the ammo later", "you'll never be able to pick up your mag" crowds.)

    A friend spends a huge amount of time in some of his classes teaching super-deliberate loading and unloading of the gun. I found it a bit odd at first, until I saw how much less time he needed to spend on reloading and stoppage clearance as so much groundwork had been laid already. And since most NDs are associated with the loading/unloading and the related admin processes, it really made sense as part of safety as well.
    2012 National Zumba Endurance Champion
    الدهون القاع الفتيات لك جعل العالم هزاز جولة الذهاب

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    1,833
    Feedback Score
    21 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ST911 View Post
    That's one of the more common things between types, each clearance starts with seating the magazine and attempting to rack the slide. An improperly seated mag or an empty chamber is also the most frequent problem, so that alone works 90% of the time.

    Teaching a reload as a universal correction can also be a thing, and as you say corrects almost everything. Issues are the availability of a spare mag or retention of the magazine in use. (Now, cue the "never hold onto a bad mag", "keep every mag...you'll need the ammo later", "you'll never be able to pick up your mag" crowds.)

    A friend spends a huge amount of time in some of his classes teaching super-deliberate loading and unloading of the gun. I found it a bit odd at first, until I saw how much less time he needed to spend on reloading and stoppage clearance as so much groundwork had been laid already. And since most NDs are associated with the loading/unloading and the related admin processes, it really made sense as part of safety as well.

    Exactly my thought process. It's a means to an end; but not the only way of doing it.
    I don't know that I would call what I spend a huge amount of time, but I do spend a fair amount covering deliberate loading and unloading mainly because virtually every ND I've had from students the last 12 years has been from someone who shoots competition and uses the competition clear. They screw up the order, rack the slide, drop the mag and bang into the berm when they drop the hammer. I have found that doing that and malfunctions up front lessens the time in class that I need to spend with people who can't get/keep their gun running.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,747
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyohte View Post
    From now on, I will describe reloads as “remove the stale twinkie and insert a fresh twinkie”. I’m not sure if there really is such a thing as a fresh twinkie, and for some reason politicians keep wanting to ban extra-stuffed twinkies.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Love it. That's almost sig line worthy.

    Quote Originally Posted by Straight Shooter View Post
    Yall are speaking what Ive been sayin for years now- all this "tactical" crap...I literally HATE that word now, along with the STUPID terminology like "workspace"..."admin reload"..calling a weapon a "platform"... F OFF with that that shit. Many more I could name & you all know them too. ENOUGH already with the Ranger Rick talk.
    Eh, I don't mind the terminology, especially when it has a clear meaning. Terms like "workspace" help people visualize what is being taught/discussed, "admin reload" refers a reload for a specific purpose, or even "platform," recognizing that a weapon is no longer simply a shooty stick, but something that is the baseline for a larger "weapon system." (yes, that's probably another term you don't like)

    I'm more annoyed by the tendency to slap rails, a grip, or just black polymer on anything and call it a "tactical" whatever. Adding a threaded barrel and suppressor height sights to a gun? Sure, use the tactical label. Put rails and an AR buttstock on a lever gun? For the love of all that is holy, no.
    It's f*****g great, putting holes in people, all the time, and it just puts 'em down mate, they drop like sacks of s**t when they go down with this.
    --British veteran of the Ukraine War, discussing the FN SCAR H.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,013
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyohte View Post
    From now on, I will describe reloads as “remove the stale twinkie and insert a fresh twinkie”. I’m not sure if there really is such a thing as a fresh twinkie, and for some reason politicians keep wanting to ban extra-stuffed twinkies.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Your twinkie is running low, double stuff it NOW.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Patron State of Shooting
    Posts
    4,396
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by just a scout View Post
    Hey!! Ranger Rick was The Dude back in the 80s and early 90s! I learned a ton from his little handbooks.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    You know.. you are right. BAD analogy, apologies, but yall know what I mean.
    And I agree it probably does have something to do with age...and I agree 100% about slappin rails and shit on a levergun and calling it "tactical". Thats a clown show for sure.
    The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than the cowards they really are.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    10,518
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyohte View Post
    From now on, I will describe reloads as “remove the stale twinkie and insert a fresh twinkie”. I’m not sure if there really is such a thing as a fresh twinkie, and for some reason politicians keep wanting to ban extra-stuffed twinkies.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    https://youtu.be/gOVN761JnrY




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •