Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: ATF proposes changing 4473 format

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    238
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tn1911 View Post
    My suspicion grows out of the very murky intentionally vague process that the ATF uses to "trace back" a firearm, when they need to.

    Its very odd how they claim they don't keep records on sales, background checks et al... yet they can trace back a gun used in a crime from the crime scene all the way back to the dealer who took stock of it right off the production line.

    If they can do that, then yes they can build a registry.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N118jYj2cA

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,841
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jpmuscle View Post
    Parallel construction was the term.
    Yes, that's it, I stand corrected!
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,841
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by andre3k View Post
    I watched the video. They aren't "allowed" to enter information that is traceable by name (which I have my doubts about whether it's actually done or not). Even assuming they are truthful about that part, nothing prevents them from cataloging by type, i.e. AR15, AK, whatever. Should push ever come to shove, they won't necessarily be searching for anything Joe Blow purchased, but instead where all those AR's and AK's are at.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •