Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Steyr loses lawsuit against SIG

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,558
    Feedback Score
    0

    Steyr loses lawsuit against SIG

    Looks like no royalties for Steyr:


    "A federal judge has sided with SIG Sauer in a suit brought by an Alabama gunmaker who claimed the New Hampshire firearms manufacturer infringed on its patent for a handgun with a plastic housing and a key metal part.

    In an order signed Tuesday, U.S. District Court Judge Joseph DiClerico Jr. denied a summary judgment requested by Steyr Arms Inc., which claimed that SIG Sauer had used Steyr technology for a plastic housing and multifunctional metal part in its P250 and P320 handgun models."

    https://www.unionleader.com/news/cou...0754ba036.html
    Last edited by Slater; 03-03-20 at 08:18.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    712
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Good. If this was legitimate and not a cash grab, the lawsuit would have come after the P250 was released in '07, and not after/during the M17 adoption in '17.
    ...they should have seen that arms in their citizens' hands could not make them tyrants, but that evil orders of government make a city tyrannize. Since they had a good government, they did not have to fear their own arms.
    --Niccolo Machiavelli, Art of War

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    605
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha-17 View Post
    Good. If this was legitimate and not a cash grab, the lawsuit would have come after the P250 was released in '07, and not after/during the M17 adoption in '17.
    Rule No. 1: Sue those with the money …

    The Private Citizen
    Liberty — Independence — Responsibility — Resolve

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    27
    Feedback Score
    0
    Crazy to see that play out.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,558
    Feedback Score
    0
    For anyone interested, this is the court brief:

    https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/...46644.77.0.pdf

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,554
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I just mostly feel bad for anyone who has to carry that SIG POS as a issued sidearm. Was never a huge fan of the Beretta, but damn I'd rather have a M9.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    822
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    I just mostly feel bad for anyone who has to carry that SIG POS as a issued sidearm. Was never a huge fan of the Beretta, but damn I'd rather have a M9.
    Are you referring to the 320? I have the X-Compact and in my opinion it is a much better pistol than my Glock 19.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    712
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    I just mostly feel bad for anyone who has to carry that SIG POS as a issued sidearm. Was never a huge fan of the Beretta, but damn I'd rather have a M9.
    Other than normal internet hate for SIG, what's your problem with the M17? I've got a commercial one, and my wife has had a compact P320 for several years now, and they're both rock solid and completely reliable. Most complaints I see are linked to the faulty test batch, the drop issue, or simply "how dare the Army not pick Glock!"
    ...they should have seen that arms in their citizens' hands could not make them tyrants, but that evil orders of government make a city tyrannize. Since they had a good government, they did not have to fear their own arms.
    --Niccolo Machiavelli, Art of War

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,554
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha-17 View Post
    Other than normal internet hate for SIG, what's your problem with the M17? I've got a commercial one, and my wife has had a compact P320 for several years now, and they're both rock solid and completely reliable. Most complaints I see are linked to the faulty test batch, the drop issue, or simply "how dare the Army not pick Glock!"
    I just didn't think much of it. The design itself seems vulnerable to user error.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    712
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    I just didn't think much of it. The design itself seems vulnerable to user error.
    Hmm. Not to be an ass, but how so? Other than the core gimmick of the M17/P320 design, the modular trigger group, everything else seems pretty simple and common across the board. Even the manual safety is pretty much your normal safety, just plugged into a striker-fired pistol. The trigger group is also pretty easy and simple to install correctly, and pretty hard to put in wrong, so I don't see it really being a problem.
    ...they should have seen that arms in their citizens' hands could not make them tyrants, but that evil orders of government make a city tyrannize. Since they had a good government, they did not have to fear their own arms.
    --Niccolo Machiavelli, Art of War

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •