I don't know. Don't we have Airwolf hidden somewhere in the desert?
I don't know. Don't we have Airwolf hidden somewhere in the desert?
Does it have an automated self nose dive feature like the Boeing max?
Whiskey
May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one
In addition to Bell, Boeing, and Sikorsky, AVX and Karem are also in the FARA-CP competition.
https://www.helis.com/database/news/...ara-ausa-2019/
https://defpost.com/ausa-2019-karem-...otype-program/
GLOCK PREFECTION
That's the S-97 Raider that lists 50-cal; it is different than Sikorsky's FARA-CP design. They look similar, but are indeed different.
See: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us...-raider-x.html
Last edited by DrMark; 03-05-20 at 18:22.
GLOCK PREFECTION
Here's a look at all five:
https://defpost.com/u-s-army-fara-pr...eting-designs/
GLOCK PREFECTION
What if this whole crusade's a charade?
And behind it all there's a price to be paid
For the blood which we dine
Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…
Have we ever had a mainstream coaxial design before?
I know the Soviets/Russians have used them extensively, but I don't recall the US ever adopting one.
Experience is a cruel teacher, gives the exam first and then the lesson.
Looks like thanks to budget cuts they had to accelerate the down select. They could no longer afford to fund 5 prototypes so now it's just Bell and Sikorsky.
Seems like they went with the one they really wanted (Sikorsky) and then hedged their bets on the safest lowest risk but also lowest performing option (Bell).
https://www.defensenews.com/smr/army...rcraft-budget/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bookmarks