Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: Boeing's "Future Attack Recon Aircraft" candidate revealed

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,213
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    Looks like a more streamlined RAH-66 Comanche. At that rate they might as well just dust off and update the existing engineering... Raider looks like somebody dialed up the old Lockheed AH-56 Cheyenne in the Wayback Machine, added Kamov-style contra-rotating main rotors and turned it into a 4-seater version.
    There's way more to the advancing blade concept dual rotor system than just having contra-rotating rotors...
    Scout Rider for the Mongol Hordes

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,454
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by caporider View Post
    There's way more to the advancing blade concept dual rotor system than just having contra-rotating rotors...
    True... main thing I find curious is they're using the same "High Maneuverability" illustrations and talking points as Lockheed did on Cheyenne, which was scrapped when it was found that all that maneuverability and close-combat engagement brought it RIGHT into the kill-boxes for the early MANPADS.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    Ye best start believin' in Orwellian Dystopias, mateys... yer LIVIN' in one!--after Capt. Hector Barbossa
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    10,518
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by caporider View Post
    There's way more to the advancing blade concept dual rotor system than just having contra-rotating rotors...
    And for the non savvy folks in the back this stuff includes?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    559
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    Bell's offering looks like it falls in with the others:

    https://www.bellflight.com/products/bell-360
    Ooooo the INVICTUS

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,213
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by jpmuscle View Post
    And for the non savvy folks in the back this stuff includes?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Two big ones are:

    - rigid rotors so they can be spaced much closer than semi-rigid/teetering rotors (lower profile, shorter control runs, etc)
    - offloading retreating rotors so they don't suffer from retreating blade stall

    ABC + prop allows for much higher speeds than traditional helicopters and much better hover characteristics than tiltrotors. You can actually do pitchless forward flight OR maintain a specific pitch attitude during forward flight. Plus, the prop can go full reverse to act as a gigantic speed brake to bring the helo to a stop very quickly.
    Scout Rider for the Mongol Hordes

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    4,665
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quite frankly, if Boeing can't do this by now, they need to up their game. I mean, Kenner showed us the way in 1985:

    Experience is a cruel teacher, gives the exam first and then the lesson.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,319
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    All these different options and I'm confident that, somehow, the Army will manage to screw it all up.
    They already did once by killing the Kiowa and insisting the AH-64E could do the same thing. I think they realize how badly they screwed up with that, so I think this program will be a go - whether it ends up as something useful is to be determined.

    Quote Originally Posted by Grand58742 View Post
    Quite frankly, if Boeing can't do this by now, they need to up their game. I mean, Kenner showed us the way in 1985:
    I saw a wind-tunnel prototype of a new Apache concept that is pretty much this thing with a push prop and stub main rotor blades. Similar, I think, to what caporider above is talking about. Found it:

    https___s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com_the-drive-cms-content-staging_message-editor%2F1583258612136-.jpg
    Last edited by sundance435; 03-04-20 at 14:30.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    704
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    In fact, Lockheed Martin/Sikorsky's candidate is going with a .50 cal weapon:

    https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us...elicopter.html
    They're also listing 7.62 mm (.30 cal) in the specifications.
    Last edited by TexHill; 03-04-20 at 16:59.
    A person who is not inwardly prepared for the use of violence against him is always weaker than the person committing the violence. - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,454
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by sundance435 View Post
    They already did once by killing the Kiowa and insisting the AH-64E could do the same thing. I think they realize how badly they screwed up with that, so I think this program will be a go - whether it ends up as something useful is to be determined.



    I saw a wind-tunnel prototype of a new Apache concept that is pretty much this thing with a push prop and stub main rotor blades. Similar, I think, to what caporider above is talking about. Found it:

    https___s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com_the-drive-cms-content-staging_message-editor%2F1583258612136-.jpg
    Actually, that's a 1980s or '90s design study for a navalized "Sea Apache." The resemblance to Cheyenne, whose collapse made Apache necessary, is uncanny.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_AH-56_Cheyenne

    Problem with Longbow-replacing-Kiowa is Longbow's sensor suite is radar, while Kiowa's "eyeball" is optical/IR.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    Ye best start believin' in Orwellian Dystopias, mateys... yer LIVIN' in one!--after Capt. Hector Barbossa
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    4,665
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by sundance435 View Post
    They already did once by killing the Kiowa and insisting the AH-64E could do the same thing. I think they realize how badly they screwed up with that, so I think this program will be a go - whether it ends up as something useful is to be determined.



    I saw a wind-tunnel prototype of a new Apache concept that is pretty much this thing with a push prop and stub main rotor blades. Similar, I think, to what caporider above is talking about. Found it:

    https___s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com_the-drive-cms-content-staging_message-editor%2F1583258612136-.jpg
    Sorry, but if Boeing can't come up with an attack helicopter that transforms into a jet fighter and has lasers shooting out of the skids, why have they been wasting our time for decades?
    Experience is a cruel teacher, gives the exam first and then the lesson.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •