They sound excited.
https://www.wandtv.com/news/executiv...a7f3b3aee.html
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Site Sponsor
They sound excited.
https://www.wandtv.com/news/executiv...a7f3b3aee.html
Member
This one also bothers me...
"Take possession of private property and obtain full title to same."
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Site Sponsor
It's almost like they WANT to pull the pin on Mr. Grenade...
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
Psalms 109:8, 43:1
LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.
Senior Member
wow. They are going all in I see.
Violating parts of the Open Meetings Act
Ban sale of firearms and ammunition
Ban sale of any alcohol
Closing of all bars, taverns, liquor stores, etc
Ban sale or giving away of gasoline or other liquid flammable or combustible products in any container other than a gasoline tank permanently fixed to a motor vehicle
Direct the shutoff of power, water, gas, etc
Take possession of private property and obtain full title to same
Prohibit or restrict ingress and egress to and from the City
Whiskey
May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one
Senior Member
Makes me wonder what local wealthy donor is having problems finding property for their new money farm.Originally Posted by grnamin
And now that the people have no sports to watch why not deprive them of booze too. What could possibly go wrong.
Sent from my SM-J727T using Tapatalk
Last edited by sgtrock82; 03-13-20 at 15:11.
Senior Member
Wow, this is still the United States isn't it?
Senior Member
This is how you create Wolverines.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Senior Member
Why title? I can understand temporarily using private property, but title?
With these declarations of emergencies and any follow on suspension of civil rights, I feel that if the niceties of the government are going to come off, as a private citizen I’m no longer encumbered by strict legalities and societal norms. These people better understand that if they think their locus of power comes from the barrel of a gun that they’re going to have the barrel of a gun pointed back at them. More so, in rural/small urban areas like downstate Champaigne. They better realize who the good guys are and work with them rather than try to take an adversarial position.
Way to start a run on ammo.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Senior Member
Passing an EO based on a situation that doesn't even exist within the local jurisdiction is pretty stupid and reactionary, but I want to see what they actually DO. If they take no actions unless an actual problem arises, ho harm no foul. If they start adversely impacting the community based on fear alone, then they deserve torches and pitchforks in response.
What if this whole crusade's a charade?
And behind it all there's a price to be paid
For the blood which we dine
Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…
Site Sponsor
They stated their intent. Whether they chicken out on follow through or not doesn't matter.
Much like if someone says they are going to kill another. They told their intended victim what they want to do and the intended victim would be wise to not forget it, lest the "intended" adjective no longer be needed.
Last edited by jsbhike; 03-13-20 at 18:22.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks