Originally Posted by
Steve Shannon
I had mixed feelings for the FNC. I think the upper receiver was the best implementation of a twin lug long stroke gas system I’ve seen (Garland -> AK -> FNC lineage). The lower was unfortunately lacking. It had no bevel for the magazine, no fence around the magazine release, and no last round bolt hold open.
Being an engineer I wanted it to be perfect.
I have a SCAR 16 that makes up for those lower receiver shortcomings, but I still prefer the two lug long stroke upper of the FNC.
I would like to have a para style stock from my old FNC carbine on the SCAR 16 also. It was the best folding stock I’ve ever had. Rigid when extended and easy to use.
Yeah, but the fact that S&H registered more FNC sears than there were host rifles to install them into meant FNC was a "best buy" for an entry level 5.56 carbine for a long time. I agree the FN para stock is probably the best one ever made, at least until the SIG 550 series came along. I still don't understand why they weren't able to carry over a FAL type bolt hold open that worked with NATO magazines.
I remember people crying about the trigger but I came in from HK rifles so I never noticed. And this was all before I even saw the movie Heat.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Bookmarks