Federal Executive Branch Inspectors Gerneral
I don't know a lot about the inspectors general, besides the obvious that they are kind of watchdogs for impropriety in the different parts of the executive branch. What I do find interesting is the idea that they are there to put a check on the head executive- either of the dept or POTUS himself.
Knowing that Congress has final oversight, it seems that the IGs are being miscast, or miss used. I see them like internal affairs in police divisions. IA isn't there to mainly watch the leadership- and certainly not the mayor. AI keeps the main employees in line and roots out poor behavior or illegal activity. Now this can be the chief of police or leadership. But the real reason you have IA is so that the executive function can have confidence on what the organization is doing.
It seems Fed IGs have been investigating leadership far more than the rank and file. We see that even when they do look at things like FISA, they don't seem to really find anything. Contrast that with the Intel IG who thought he had the mandate to corral in POTUS. How many IGs are there? How many could have mini impeachments going?
And any blame for the China flu issues not landing at the feet of DHS, FDA and the CDC is laughable.
Any basis for this?
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks