Page 3 of 18 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 174

Thread: PSA BCG, quality or nah?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Posts
    32
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by turnburglar View Post
    I feel like PSA's "poor quality" reputation on these forums is just ghosts from their past. A lot of posters spent really good money on a rifle from a 'known quality assembler' and they just won't let their egos down long enough to see you can get good AR parts from lots of places. I have a PSA premium BCG from 2013 that probably has 4,000 rounds under it. Looks fine and will continue to ride in my main match rifle. I also have one of their nitrided BCG's from 2018 that now has past 2,000 rounds and it is also running great.

    To rebuff the common: "PSA has good suppliers but they don't get the same specs as other companies" myth; I decided to measure the gas port on two 'PSA' barrels. Because everyone on the forums thinks PSA has terribly huge gas ports. The 10.5 mike'd out to 0.073 and the 16" mid by FN had a 0.076 gas port. Not the smallest, but they definitely don't deserve the bad rap they get here.

    A lot of people come to the forums expecting some well thought out scientific presentation on why brand X is superior to brand Y, and the reality is; the data simply doesn't exist. Theres so much more ego and myth than testing and data in the gun world. I feel like in every post I defend PSA I have to also enumerate that I carried a Colt for years and have a BCM in the safe. Im not a budget whore, but Ill save money on parts and spend it on cases of ammo if I can.
    good post thanks

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    not ohio
    Posts
    469
    Feedback Score
    0
    You will see a common defense of PSA is the price.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    not ohio
    Posts
    469
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Texas Sob View Post
    good post thanks
    that is not a good post. his arguments basically boil down to, "mine runs fine."

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    965
    Feedback Score
    24 (100%)
    I have a couple of their premium offerings. One lives in a 10.5" suppressed upper that gets abused. I would say it has a few thousand rounds through it and it's still going strong.

    Sent from my moto e5 (XT1920DL) using Tapatalk

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    408
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by turnburglar View Post
    I feel like PSA's "poor quality" reputation on these forums is just ghosts from their past. A lot of posters spent really good money on a rifle from a 'known quality assembler' and they just won't let their egos down long enough to see you can get good AR parts from lots of places. I have a PSA premium BCG from 2013 that probably has 4,000 rounds under it. Looks fine and will continue to ride in my main match rifle. I also have one of their nitrided BCG's from 2018 that now has past 2,000 rounds and it is also running great.

    To rebuff the common: "PSA has good suppliers but they don't get the same specs as other companies" myth; I decided to measure the gas port on two 'PSA' barrels. Because everyone on the forums thinks PSA has terribly huge gas ports. The 10.5 mike'd out to 0.073 and the 16" mid by FN had a 0.076 gas port. Not the smallest, but they definitely don't deserve the bad rap they get here.

    A lot of people come to the forums expecting some well thought out scientific presentation on why brand X is superior to brand Y, and the reality is; the data simply doesn't exist. Theres so much more ego and myth than testing and data in the gun world. I feel like in every post I defend PSA I have to also enumerate that I carried a Colt for years and have a BCM in the safe. Im not a budget whore, but Ill save money on parts and spend it on cases of ammo if I can.
    That is all well and good, but, as mentioned above, PSA probably does way more volume of sales, than your go-to BCM, Colt, KAC, Sionics, etc.

    I don't doubt you have a decent barrel from them. But with all the sales they do, they're bound to get a lemon or ten out there, where-as the reputable companies have to charge more for the quality control.


    ETA: I'm running a Toolcraft C158 BCG in an 11.5 pistol, unsuppressed, that has approximately the same round count (BCG mentioned above is in a 14.5"). All rings intact, though the bolt won't support the weight of the entire BCG vertically.
    Last edited by CrowCommand; 04-05-20 at 16:58.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,089
    Feedback Score
    0
    I never knew that there was such a disparity in quality among all the available BCG's. Live and learn.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    328
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulkstr8 View Post
    that is not a good post. his arguments basically boil down to, "mine runs fine."
    Exactly. Small sample size and comparatively few rounds fired.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,177
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Some examples of bad PSA quality control, in these videos you can see several problems with a PSA upper, including a bad barrel extension, firing pin protrusion issues, and probably a tight chamber. And this was the third bad upper that this individual had dealt with from PSA.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nupt3c-tQbw
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-F2gWqSdog

    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    I never knew that there was such a disparity in quality among all the available BCG's. Live and learn.
    There are huge disparities in quality between them.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    678
    Feedback Score
    0
    Again I will say that PSA premium BCG are made by Tool Craft. How can some of you praise Tool Craft in this thread and then basically say that PSA Premium BCG made by Tool Craft is garbage? Makes no sense to me.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    9,937
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cold/Bore View Post
    Exactly. Small sample size and comparatively few rounds fired.
    If you've been paying attention, a lot of folks are saying their PSA's run fine, on this forum and others.

    I think that at this point PSA's model - quantity sales - ought to be obvious.

    Do they have the QC in place that BCM, Sionics and others have? No, probably not. But what they do have is several times the combined sales of BCM, Sionics and several others. I believe the Nazi's would have called the PSA Freedom line Volkssturmgewehr, Ford would call them Escorts.

    Point being, they work fine for most folks.

    Don't be this guy: (I think I saw this in a mem on pistol forum and modified it a little)

    It's day eleven of the Apocalypse.

    You've escaped into the hills with your supplies, and are crouching in some bushes watching with your Nightforce equipped long boi to see if you've been followed. Nobody could spot your ghillie suit from this hide.

    All of a sudden, you hear a crack, frome closer than you'd expect. There's a sharp pain in your neck as the TulAmmo FMJ round tears it's way through. You've been hit by Boogaloo Bob, with his UTG decked out PSA.

    You feel the wet heat as he looms inches from your face, dropping crumbs on the ground all around you. His voice creaks with moistness. 'Just as good' he whispers, stepping over your body as everything fades to black. He reaches out for your weapon with his Cheeto stained fingers. The last thing you feel - his NCSTAR sling gliding over your face.
    Last edited by 26 Inf; 04-05-20 at 20:29.
    Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President... - Theodore Roosevelt, Lincoln and Free Speech, Metropolitan Magazine, Volume 47, Number 6, May 1918.

    Every Communist must grasp the truth. Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party Mao Zedong, 6 November, 1938 - speech to the Communist Patry of China's sixth Central Committee

Page 3 of 18 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •