Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Projectile advancements worth upgrade?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    45
    Feedback Score
    0

    Projectile advancements worth upgrade?

    Have the last 10-15 years brought meaningful advancements in bullet technology to the extent that an upgrade is recommended?

    The reason for asking, my 9mm carry ammunition supply consists of Federal Tactical Bonded 124 and Gold Dot 124+P. I have a good supply of each. Both of these were introduced at least 10-15 years ago (my supply is not that old though). Is there any compelling terminal ballistics reason to sell current stock to rotate them out for new iterations, I.e Hornady Critical Duty or Gold Dot G2?

    Platforms are Glock 19, and S&W Shield.

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    236
    Feedback Score
    0
    The Hornady CD and Speer G2 are great. So are what you use now, and they are proven reliable in your guns.

    Shoot what you have. Put the bullets where they need to go and you’re fine.

    My Dept might switch to 9mm in a year or so. We’ll likely use the G2 147gr. It rocks In the FBI protocol. But then, so do the others.

    With any of your options, no need to over-think it. Bullet placement is what matters way more than which of these you shoot.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2,062
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by fsumach View Post
    Have the last 10-15 years brought meaningful advancements in bullet technology to the extent that an upgrade is recommended?

    The reason for asking, my 9mm carry ammunition supply consists of Federal Tactical Bonded 124 and Gold Dot 124+P. I have a good supply of each. Both of these were introduced at least 10-15 years ago (my supply is not that old though). Is there any compelling terminal ballistics reason to sell current stock to rotate them out for new iterations, I.e Hornady Critical Duty or Gold Dot G2?

    Platforms are Glock 19, and S&W Shield.

    Thanks!
    Nothing significantly improving over what you have. The Fed Bonded doesn’t have a following for whatever reason but I recall it being on “the list.” Gold Dot +P is still doing good work around the country. If you had been rocking 90s vintage PLBE then I’d say hell yeah upgrade. But you already have good stuff. Hornady is the newer kid in the market but again, I don’t think it’s any major improvement.
    AQ planned for years and sent their A team to carry out the attacks, and on Flight 93 they were thwarted by a pick-up team made up of United Frequent Fliers. Many people look at 9/11 and wonder how we can stop an enemy like that. I look at FL93 and wonder, "How can we lose?". -- FromMyColdDeadHand

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    141
    Feedback Score
    0
    Just FYI, my department was switching from old gold dots to the newer G2, but was told their performance out of short barrels was not as good as the older gold dots.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,629
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    The newest designs focus on getting to the deeper end of the penetration window, especially through barriers.

    The previous gen designs you reference will reliably meet at least the minimum spec with generally a bit more expansion.

    This may or may not matter to you based on your needs, but it's way less than the last generation advancement. I think it was made because of the high percentage of LE shootings that happen in or around vehicles.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,747
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    I havent seen the need to switch from HSTs since the late 2000's.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    45
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks all, sounds like what I have is good to go.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    239
    Feedback Score
    0
    Still believe HST to be the best all round hollow point. Not a fan of the G2 or anything that Hornady offers.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Patron State of Shooting
    Posts
    4,396
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Glock9mm1990 View Post
    Still believe HST to be the best all round hollow point. Not a fan of the G2 or anything that Hornady offers.
    You are about the first one besides me to publicly say you arent a fan of anything from Hornady. GOOD.
    Ive several reasons, none of which I care to go over again, but Ive stated them here a few times.
    Others may think its the best ammo on Earth. Ok, fine. I dont like it and unless they change some things, wont.
    The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than the cowards they really are.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    903
    Feedback Score
    0
    Most of my points have been covered well above. Bonded projectiles were the major development over the last 15 years, followed by optimizing cartridges to more common shorter barrel lengths.

    Not sure all the most recent innovation meets my specific needs. More penetration is good but balanced bonded bullets seem Goldilocks for me. I have a healthy amount of 9mm Gold Dot G1 laid in and believe it will continue to be viable, if not still best of breed.

    In .38 Special revolvers, I generally only carry two inch snubbies. The bullet performance gain has been impressive for the short guns, but those same rounds wouldn’t be optimal in four inch or longer barrel. Federal retirement of the well balanced Nycald Hollow point is probably more a result of the declining.38 sales, but I miss it.

    We might be in a Golden Age of cartridges. Pretty awesome but also hard to surpass.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •