Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: Broward County LEO gets Job back after Parkland

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    178
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Grand58742 View Post
    If an LEO is unwilling to run to the gunfire especially when children are being slaughtered, they damn well should find another line of work.
    Eff Scott Israel. Eff Scot Peterson. Eff Brian Miller. Eff Robert Runcie. Eff Rick Scott. Nobody on the Broward County School Board should ever be reelected either.
    ^^^ This is all that needs to be said and it's not even debatable.

    But I'll add that I'm not, and never have been an LEO but if I were I'd be going in praying to God that my aim was true, and if not, and it was time for me to to meet him that I was ready and looking forward to said meeting. If ordered to wait by an OIC I'd fly him a middle finger and go anyway. Eff anyone that holds back help to kids being slaughtered or attempts to justify it. I'd deal with whatever ramifications later and sleep well for it.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,235
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Warren v. DC.

    This douche is covered.
    ..It was you to me who taught
    In Jersey anythings' legal, as long as you don't get caught.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    16,086
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex V View Post
    Warren v. DC.

    This douche is covered.
    It saved the RO from criminal charges but I'm unclear how to applies to this firing for dereliction of duty. I'm thinking the fact the SOP was changed form "shall" to "may" immediately engage and active shooter is what would save him.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com


    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,235
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    It saved the RO from criminal charges but I'm unclear how to applies to this firing for dereliction of duty. I'm thinking the fact the SOP was changed form "shall" to "may" immediately engage and active shooter is what would save him.
    If they aren't legally required to protect us, and he doesn't protect us, despite SOP, it isn't a dereliction of duty. I know it's slightly flawed thinking on my part since legal liability and job responsibility are different but I'm certain a good lawyer can use the legal precedent to show that the guy didn't think that it was compulsory for him to engage?
    ..It was you to me who taught
    In Jersey anythings' legal, as long as you don't get caught.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •