As people dig deeper into the just released House transcripts it's becoming more clear.
The FBI disseminated a "summary" of the Kislyak call that was not unmasked because they never minimized it nor made a "finished" transcript. As I understand it that means it never went to NSA and wouldn't be found with any of these unmasking requests.
This brings up a couple of points:
1) Where did it come from? Some are speculating it's backdoor foreign intel, but the obvious answer seems to be right in front of us. If Papadopoulos started this with bar talk, why only a FISA on Page? Because Page was an easier target, and the purpose of the FISA was to get into, and then THREE HOP through the whole campaign.
2) All the unmasking revealed it was just a Tuesday in the Obama administration, we kinda already knew this because there were a bunch before the Kislyak call. Why is the Treasury Sec and FIVE of his underlings unmasking Flynn? The Flynn unmaskings are "tip of the iceberg" per Nunes.
3) The Flynn persecution claimed they have no recordings in response to a brady request, Comey and McCabe say there was never a finished transcript made. The original 302 of Flynn is "missing", even though the FBI has an entire computer system designed to keep them. So it seems entirely possible that Flynn was persecuted for lying, by comparing a summary of a 302 to a summary of the call.


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks