Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Leupold TMR reticle, any good for long range? (800-1000 yards)

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    872
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hammer_Man View Post
    Any idea when that may be coming?
    Nope. It was mentioned on a podcast by Jon Pynch, who's sponsored by Leupold. He mentioned helping to develop the reticle, but not a timeline on it's release.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    25
    Feedback Score
    0
    Not going back to read all the new posts, but did I mention that Midway has the Mark 4 4.5-14 on sale.

    https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1362173644
    Fire in the Hole

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,383
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by army_eod View Post
    Not going back to read all the new posts, but did I mention that Midway has the Mark 4 4.5-14 on sale.

    https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1362173644
    Mil reticle, MOA turrets.

    There is a reason they have been trying to blow them out for the past year.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    3,484
    Feedback Score
    58 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by RHINOWSO View Post
    Mil reticle, MOA turrets.

    There is a reason they have been trying to blow them out for the past year.
    I never understood what in hell they were thinking with the "MIL/MOA" thing.
    A true "Gun Guy" (or gal) should have familiarity and a modicum of proficiency with most all firearms platforms.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,383
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by gaijin View Post
    I never understood what in hell they were thinking with the "MIL/MOA" thing.
    It's Leupold, a lot of what they do mystifies me....

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    698
    Feedback Score
    49 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by gaijin View Post
    I never understood what in hell they were thinking with the "MIL/MOA" thing.
    So...mils have long since been used in the military for artillery. But when the military went to spec out a scope, the standard for optics (hunting or competition) in the US was MOA adjustments. I'm not 100% sure whether this was a mere oversight on failure of requesting mil turrets or was a spec that couldn't be met by the mfg....or likely met in a timely fashion. Regardless...it was a mistake on somebody's part and not done purposefully (at least from a functional standpoint).

    Once these things got delivered, they were stuck in the system.
    "Adapt and overcome"... became "that's the way we've done it/teach it". Thus this mismatched abomination existed for far too long.

    What's worse is the flawed logic that the military way is the best way and there must be some good reason to go this way...there isn't. However, people blindly follow this logic still. Thankfully, these things are harder to come by these days and people are starting to wise up...relatively speaking.
    Last edited by pointblank4445; 06-12-20 at 11:29.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •