Originally Posted by
IKnowNotEverything
The one thing i have learned from this forum is that i will not make a recommendation without a budget. You are asking if you should trade in a design that is 100+ years old for a modern pistol with exemplary reliability. You wouldn't really be asking if you didn't have an idea of the answer.
I believe that the 9mm vs 45 debate has been settled by modern hollowpoint design. No one wants to get shot with that shit, regardless of caliber.
I also believe that if you enjoy the 1911 design there are modern options that are affordable and reliable. The M&P can keep the manual safety and lose the archaic grip safety, lose a bunch of weight and has extended magazines if you decide you have to have a 45.
The STI Staccato is winning contracts, has double the capacity, and looks ****ing awesome. The Wilson Combat EDC9 or whatever is an expensive but apparently great firearm.
I am personally drawn to the Dan Wesson DWX compact. CZ75 ergos and magazines, 1911 trigger and safety, and Browning tilt-barrel action make it a modern fusion of proven design.
I'd like to see where you land. I feel this is a conversation more and more people are having with themselves. I'm actually looking at .45s right now, just because i want one.
I just got an M&P 2.0 9 compact. Feels great. Can hardly wait to shoot it. Usually, I go out in the Gulf and shoot at bleach bottles (yes, I have a length of line on them so I can pull them back to the boat, and not pollute the Gulf with any more plastic than it already has). Raining, so I'll have to wait a couple of days.
Thanks, everyone for all the input and comments for me to think about.
Last edited by REDinFL; 06-05-20 at 17:04.
Hurrah for The Bonnie Blue Flag that bears a single star
Bookmarks