Originally Posted by
okie
There's a method to BLM's madness. They select cases that have no actual merit, to ensure they get maximum use out of them. If they picked cases that had merit, everyone would get behind them, the cops would be indicted and convicted, and that would be that.
That's not what they want, though. They want maximum controversy and division. The last thing they want is for everyone to come together for a common good. And the last thing their handlers want is for people to all come together to put out of control government in its place. All relevant interests here lie in dividing the American people themselves.
Ding, ding , ding. Winner. ‘Hands up, don’t shoot” was a complete lie. Trayvon played stupid games and won stupid prizes.
The case in Dayton where a Nancy called about a black guy with a gun, who was then “bang, stop or I’ll shoot” killed, was a guy buying a BB gun talking on his cell phone. Lots of good lessons from that one, not much press and no BLM. Plus, never mind the 1000 armed thugs that get smacked down versus the 10 or so of unarmed ones.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks