Originally Posted by
Bellycrawl
I'll continue the conversation here. I'm liking this round. My 9 year old son took his first dear with the 6 ARC (103 ELD-X) at 110 yds. We were not able to recover the bullet as it went through both lungs and exited. The bullet caused significant damage to the vitals as the doe took two steps and dropped. We have also shot the 6 ARC (108 ELD-Ms) out to 1200 yards. My 18" MSR gets 2540 fps, which at 6000' elevation where I live, this round does well.
Not totally a fair comparison, but the 6 ARC is neck and neck with the 140 grain Underwood ammo I shoot in my 6.5 CM Sig Cross. This factory load is loaded with Nosler bullets. Both rifles (Cross & MSR) way about the same with similar accuracy. The 6 ARC beats this configuration of 6.5 CM in drop all the way out to 1200 and doesn't lack too far behind in energy. My son can also ping steel at 1200 fairly easy (14.2 mils at 6000' elevation) where we shoot at Cheyenne Mountain shooting complex. The Cross, 18" 6.5CM takes 15.1 mils to get to the same distance. Additionally, at 1200, the 6.5 CM only as around 70 foot pound more energy. At 600, the 6.5CM only has 160 more foot pound of energy. If someone is looking to build, haul and hunt with a compact rifle, the 6 ARC is a good option for white tail and recreation shooting, etc.
Lastly, I've been trying to get my son familiar with the MSR since the collapsible stock allows us to shoot the same rifle easily. Plus, he is learning to handload, and I'm saving a few cents in reloading the 6 ARC vs 6.5 CM. The reduced recoil, ergonomics, accuracy and lightweight makes for a good option for a hunting rifle for a youth.
Living at 6000' helps with some of the velocity woes others have expressed, but for an MSR, this is a great round.
BC
Bookmarks