Rasmussen Poll- 34% of Americans feel Civil War likely within 5 years

[Nightvisionary]

Again, why hasn’t anybody done anything about it? You seemed to have missed it. Why hasn’t anybody done something rather than let these people accumulate power and influence? Why haven’t the 3%ers, the oath keepers, and all the other chest thumpers put wheels in motion? Why are you still on your couch?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I got off my couch and ventured into some gray zones. The powers that be made their presence known. The nail that sticks out gets hammered down.

[PracticalRifleman]

I got off my couch and ventured into some gray zones. The powers that be made their presence known. The nail that sticks out gets hammered down.

So now what? Bend over?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Esq.]

So now what? Bend over?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wait for more nails to stick up?


Just a tip for those thinking of organizing locally etc....You know how to spot The Fed? He's the guy who's always telling everyone else to DO SOMETHING!!!!

[Nightvisionary]

So, your plan is to what? Surrender and go quietly when they come for you?

Well even Hiroo Onoda eventually saw the futility of continuing his one man resistance.

[Nightvisionary]

So now what? Bend over?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I honestly don't know.

[Grand58742]

noun
noun: empire; plural noun: empires
1.
an extensive group of states or countries under a single supreme authority, formerly especially an emperor or empress.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are you really going to Webster your way out of an argument as to why we aren't an empire? I mean, if you are going by the "classical" definitions, we aren't an empire just like modern day liberals aren't really "liberals" per the official definition of liberalism.

Yes, we are an empire. We have fought, meddled and gained our way into it. We may not have a "supreme leader" per the definition, but neither did the British when they were referred to as an empire even though the King/Queen wasn't technically the head of the government since the early 19th century. Or the Soviet empire during their brief period in history. So on and so forth.

[PracticalRifleman]

Are you really going to Webster your way out of an argument as to why we aren't an empire? I mean, if you are going by the "classical" definitions, we aren't an empire just like modern day liberals aren't really "liberals" per the official definition of liberalism.

Yes, we are an empire. We have fought, meddled and gained our way into it. We may not have a "supreme leader" per the definition, but neither did the British when they were referred to as an empire even though the King/Queen wasn't technically the head of the government since the early 19th century. Or the Soviet empire during their brief period in history. So on and so forth.

You do realize “liberal” in other countries has a completely different definition.

Words mean things. I’m sorry you don’t like it. “Meddling in affairs for a beneficial outcome” isn’t the same as ruling a nation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[PracticalRifleman]

I honestly don't know.

Me either. I hear everything from “head to the hills” to “blaze of glory” from colleagues.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Grand58742]

You do realize “liberal” in other countries has a completely different definition.

Words mean things. I’m sorry you don’t like it. “Meddling in affairs for a beneficial outcome” isn’t the same as ruling a nation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You do realize one can have an empire without having a sovereign leader as well?

Just like words, the definitions can change over time.

[PracticalRifleman]

You do realize one can have an empire without having a sovereign leader as well?

Just like words, the definitions can change over time.

Write your opinion in to Webster then.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk