Originally Posted by
REDinFL
I'd still suspect a "honey pot." Even if they didn't start that way, they will be infiltrated.
I mean, to be blunt, every group will be at some point. Or at least an attempt made; maybe even by people who aren't even feds. It's going to happen, and not something that needs to paralyze any organization or actions. It just needs to be understood that it will happen, and then be addressed accordingly.
I'm also not entirely against groups looking into people to see what they're about; creeping compromise will kill a movement just as dead as a fed.
That being said, I can't help but share a raised eyebrow here over this where I have a group where their first two opening moves are to ask for money (a nice specifically identifiable trail right back to you) and then say they now need more of all my info so I can be "part of the club".
IF this goal of this is for AmCon cadre to act more as the catalyst/go-between for cross country organization by setting up a network, and traveling around to provide training, not BE the organization themselves (as he's stated in the update vids), then WHY is Amcon Actual doing this mass "vetting"?
Shouldn't that be something left up to each individual local group?
Maybe AmCon could offer local groups affordable options for vetting their members IF they choose to avail themselves of such, but why do I need to give such a central org all my info to store...somewhere.
I get it, like Mike said in the recent update vid, they want to be sure of who they're calling up in an future event, natural or man-made.
But again... why can't the local groups do as much of this as they need/want to feel comfortable by themselves.
Why can't a group just run their guys down to the local gunshop and run an NICS in five minutes for $10 each (of whatever the fee is); if that's good enough for me to buy a "weapon of war"... why do I need deeper 'vetting'? Heck, if I photo-copy my CHL that should be enough proof that I'm 'good to go'.
Maybe if you really suspect infiltration, allow your group to let you check members' social media for marxist drivel as well.
Here is one of the update videos to which I refer;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NP4jG1_Xno
He seems sincere enough, and pi$$ed off enough, even if I personally think some of the talking points are bit too 'conservative'. But then, benefit of the doubt, it's an off the cuff video, so maybe I've just misinterpreted some things a bit. And yet at the same time... I think that whole "it's to sensible to be wrong" and "mom country and apple pie" vibe that I've heard everywhere else before is also part of what's driving my suspicion, coupled with my previous post on their site-conduct notice.
I do hope I am proved wildly wrong....
Last edited by Jellybean; 08-20-20 at 11:55.
"Once we get some iron in our souls, we'll get some iron in our hands..."
"...A rapid, aggressive response will let you get away with some pretty audacious things if you are willing to be mean, fast, and naked."-Failure2Stop
"The Right can meme; the Left can organize. I guess now we know which one is important." - Random internet comment
Bookmarks