Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011
Results 101 to 110 of 110

Thread: Breonna Taylor Shooting, New Details...The Media etc Really IS Trying to Start a War

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,825
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by C-grunt View Post
    I wondering if the grand jury was given a chance to consider rape charges or money laundering charges?? They only present the charges they are going after. Did they bring up potential charges against the boyfriend for shooting the officer? No? Probably because, like homicide charges against the officers, the case has little chance of actually being successful.


    The two officers at the front door who were shot at have the law on their side for why they shot back. They third guy blindly firing through a side door or window or whatever has a hard time justifying that action.



    https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/grand_jury

    "The grand jury acts as an investigative body, acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge. Criminal prosecutors present the case to the grand jury. The prosecutors attempt to establish probable cause to believe that a criminal offense has been committed. The grand jury may request that the court compel further evidence, including witness testimony and subpoenas of documents. The grand jury is generally free to pursue its investigations unhindered by external influence or supervision."

  2. #102
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,286
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Maybe Ann's stating what's already been out there. This is the first time I've heard these things all together. Sounds liked somebody got hosed for 12 mil.

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...of-a-blm-hero/

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,825
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by TomMcC View Post
    Maybe Ann's stating what's already been out there. This is the first time I've heard these things all together. Sounds liked somebody got hosed for 12 mil.

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...of-a-blm-hero/
    Ann is rehashing claims that have already been made. Assuming the story she is rehashing is bogus is to err on the side of caution.

    Jefferson County and the city of Louisville, pre and post merger, including LE agencies, are like a light version of Chicago, NYC, and similar.

    Prior to the enactment of Kentucky's concealed carry law, Jefferson County/ Louisville was one of the primary areas that would hassle open carriers which was 100% legal. When concealed carry legislation started gaining momentum they of course opposed that. When the state legislature decreed that all confiscated Firearms would be sold at auction to fund body armor purchases Jefferson County/Louisville decided that the state legislature didn't really mean it and began warehousing confiscated Firearms until the legislature passed the law during the next session that they really did mean it.

    Not every officer in that jurisdiction is a lemon, but when lemons pop-up they frequently get defended similar to these gems making the news lately.

    https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/in-a-d...747b53328.html
    Last edited by jsbhike; 12-17-20 at 12:12.

  4. #104
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,286
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by jsbhike View Post
    Ann is rehashing claims that have already been made. Assuming the story she is rehashing is bogus is to err on the side of caution.

    Jefferson County and the city of Louisville, pre and post merger, including LE agencies, are like a light version of Chicago, NYC, and similar.

    Prior to the enactment of Kentucky's concealed carry law, Jefferson County/ Louisville was one of the primary areas that would hassle open carriers which was 100% legal. When concealed carry legislation started gaining momentum they of course opposed that. When the state legislature decreed that all confiscated Firearms would be sold at auction to fund body armor purchases Jefferson County/Louisville decided that the state legislature didn't really mean it and began warehousing confiscated Firearms until the legislature passed the law during the next session that they really did mean it.

    Not every officer in that jurisdiction is a lemon, but when lemons pop-up they frequently get defended similar to these gems making the news lately.

    https://www.wdrb.com/in-depth/in-a-d...747b53328.html
    I don't want be a special pleader for or a false criticizer of the police, and you seem to know much more about the on ground situation in that area, but man is that a lot of lies to deal with from the cops in this case.
    Last edited by TomMcC; 12-17-20 at 14:36.

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,825
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...officers-fire/

    "Among other alleged violations, Gentry wrote that Jaynes “lied” in writing on the warrant application that he verified through a U.S. postal inspector that Taylor was receiving packages related to her ex-boyfriend’s alleged drug activity."

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    440
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by jsbhike View Post
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...officers-fire/

    "Among other alleged violations, Gentry wrote that Jaynes “lied” in writing on the warrant application that he verified through a U.S. postal inspector that Taylor was receiving packages related to her ex-boyfriend’s alleged drug activity."
    Well that’s certainly an interesting twist. So...begs to be asked, why was the PD so eager to get in that house?

  7. #107
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,837
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by jsbhike View Post
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/grand_jury

    "The grand jury acts as an investigative body, acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge. Criminal prosecutors present the case to the grand jury. The prosecutors attempt to establish probable cause to believe that a criminal offense has been committed. The grand jury may request that the court compel further evidence, including witness testimony and subpoenas of documents. The grand jury is generally free to pursue its investigations unhindered by external influence or supervision."
    Have you ever been in front of a Grand Jury? Ever?

    That site you linked also most commonly deals with or cites federal law, which is not relevant in this instance.

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,825
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by bp7178 View Post
    Have you ever been in front of a Grand Jury? Ever?

    That site you linked also most commonly deals with or cites federal law, which is not relevant in this instance.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_..._United_States

    Plug this phrase in to the search the page tool and see which state it goes to.

    "The rules are very similar to the federal process;"

  9. #109
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,837
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Stop with the Google nonsense. Answer the first question.

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,825
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by bp7178 View Post
    Stop with the Google nonsense. Answer the first question.
    I haven't been a witness to anything being investigated by a grand jury. Have you?

    What part of the Cornell description did you find fault with exactly?

Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •