Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 106

Thread: Bundeswehr picks AR as new service rifle

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    10,518
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    I still want a 433....


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13,549
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by jpmuscle View Post
    I still want a 433....


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    It’s not always about you

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    10,518
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly View Post
    It’s not always about you

    To the face


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Not in a gun friendly state
    Posts
    3,807
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly View Post
    It’s 2020 and Germans are making ARs and Americans are making AK-74s.

    The boys want the boys and the girls want the girls, it’s a mixed up, muddled up, far out world
    It's funny, that for most of the AR's existence, up until the end of this past decade, every country in Europe, with the exception of the Netherlands, was hellbent on finding a 5.56 service rifle that was anything but an AR. Now, they're all ditching their wonder guns that supposedly had all the AR's strengths and none of its weaknesses and picking up...AR-based rifles. Weird how things come around like that.

    But on that note, I'm wondering if the DI AR's days are numbered in the U.S. military. I'm not saying it SHOULD be, but it seems like most of the countries that have picked up new AR-based service rifles have gone with piston designs. And of course, the USMC has already traded in the M4 for the M27, and everybody knows the rule that the Marines don't get to have newer or cooler toys than the Army. The Army's hair-brained Next Gen Weapons System that is supposedly going to replace everything from submachine guns up to anti-material sniper rifles is destined to fail. So I can't help but wonder if this, the 416, or (more likely) a piston AR from Sig Sauer is going to be the new service rifle for the Army in the next few years.
    Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who do not.-Ben Franklin

    there’s some good in this world, Mr. Frodo. And it’s worth fighting for.-Samwise Gamgee

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,984
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly View Post
    https://www.mdr.de/thueringen/sued-t...swehr-100.html



    G36 is dead. Long live the Haenel. I was right and also wrong. I knew the 433 was going nowhere (it’s trash) but I hoped they would have gone with the 14.5 416 (the best overall length of 416 IMO. Feel free to fite me irl about it)

    I know nothing about Haenel but it’s essentially a cheaper off-brand piston AR. Money and politics were the issue here. Still at least it’s a real gun this time.

    To think, in the 50s they aaaalllmost went AR-10. So it’s full circle now. G3s are nice but old.
    Ironically the Haenel Stg 45 (m) led directly to the Cetme / G3 system.

    G36s wins for CDI factor and I'd still buy a legit semi if they ever offered it but man it had problems, starting with the optic system from Hensoldt. Wanted to like it, wanted to like it...but man what a pain in the ass. Still want a XM8 while we are at it.

    But this is the practical direction for sure. With all of the R&D "road to nowhere" projects Hans and Franz need to get 50 years out of this weapon system.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,424
    Feedback Score
    0
    No M-Lok? M1913 rails? Red dot, not a LPVO? Spppfffttt. Not Boogaloo rated...
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Northern UT
    Posts
    4,245
    Feedback Score
    69 (100%)
    According to the HK rep at shot earlier this year, the only way we would maybe possibly get a US 433 is if they don’t get the German contract, so for those of us who want one this is good news.

    Quote Originally Posted by jpmuscle View Post
    I still want a 433....


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I paint spaceship parts.

    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    Stippled Glocks are like used underwear; previous owner makes all the difference in value.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    10,518
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by VIP3R 237 View Post
    According to the HK rep at shot earlier this year, the only way we would maybe possibly get a US 433 is if they don’t get the German contract, so for those of us who want one this is good news.
    My interest is peaked.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    6,946
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    Interesting development. I would have also thought HK. What a wonderful world in which we live that many NATO countries are going AR, most of our police department shoots Austrian guns, and our military uses Austrian and Germano-Austrian pistols after using Italian guns...

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Butte, Montana
    Posts
    263
    Feedback Score
    0
    According to Chris Bartocci, some engineers who helped develop the HK416 short stroke piston system later helped SIG develop the short stroke piston system for the sig 516. Then, they went to help Caracal design their short stroke gas piston system. His opinion is that each system improved on the previous in some incremental way, although I don’t recall that he mentioned what those incremental improvements might have been.

    An article on HKPro suggests that Haenel is part of the Caracal group of companies now. I wonder how much (if any) of the short stroke gas piston system that these engineers helped design three times is present in the Haenel.

    I was also interested to see that although the photograph Firefly posted has all three selector positions marked, there’s no autosear pin or hole visible.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •