Page 3 of 19 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 186

Thread: SCOTUS Replacement

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,417
    Feedback Score
    0
    Obama didn't want Garland confirmed.

    Obama didn't do anything to get Garland confirmed.

    Garland was an election ploy to help Dem Senate candidates.

    These are the only facts that matter in relation to 2016.

    Garland was a false nominee that Obama didn't really want on the court. He knew the Mitch wouldn't confirm anyone if he didn't face a lot of pressure. So Obama puts up Garland and then does nothing- literally nothing- to get his nomination to proceed. What they did do is use Garland as a tool against swing state GOP senate candidates. Obama, and everyone, knew that HRC was going to win and end up appointing someone of her own choosing. RBG was holding on to be replaced by a woman, nominated by the first woman POTUS.

    Opps.

    That all blew up in their faces. Maybe not getting Thomas to resign last year will blow up in our faces.

    We all know that in the reverse, the Dems would be pushing hard.

    I am also getting a little tired of these nearly terroristic threats that if Trump does this, that democracy is 'endangered' and who knows what will happen. They thinly veil these threats of violence, then transfer that onto the GOP, and cry foul again.

    Frankly, I'd take that seat on SCOTUS even if it costs us POTUS and the Senate. SCOTUS picks are like chess Queens that are almost immortal. If we can get a true majority, even for 5-10 years, that could be key.

    Also, the Dems have to be pressed for if they would vote to expand SCOTUS. I know those promises don't mean anything, but if they say no, they piss off their base. If they say 'yes' that puts them on a pretty fringe and nasty viewpoint. Popular with their lefty side, but would show that they are all about the power by any means.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    4,036
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Pelosi won't rule out using impeachment as option to stop Trump Supreme Court pick

    Heads exploding...going to be an exciting several weeks!!


    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pel...eme-court-pick
    "You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass."
    Japanese Admiral Yamamoto, 1941




    "A wise man's heart directs him toward the right, but a foolish man's heart directs him toward the left."
    Ecclesiastes 10:2:

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    4,665
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Artos View Post
    Pelosi won't rule out using impeachment as option to stop Trump Supreme Court pick

    Heads exploding...going to be an exciting several weeks!!


    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pel...eme-court-pick
    Yeah, saw that. I'm not sure how they can impeach for him doing something he has to do per the Constitution.

    Not that it matters...
    Experience is a cruel teacher, gives the exam first and then the lesson.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,417
    Feedback Score
    0
    Isn't using the saying that you'd use every 'arrow in our quiver' racist towards Indians?
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    6,943
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    Barrett is the smart choice.

    The Dems are so off their rockers it's nuts. Republicans and Trump et al., need to say, "WE'RE not the ones threatening to burn down cities...."

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    15,411
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Going all the way back to Obama's first term, Ginsberg could have retired, or She could have/should have waited to the middle of his second term. All of that is conjecture because she didn't and wouldn't.
    I believe because of the BS drama caused by the "Russia Probe", Ginsberg hung in there to possibly impeach Trump via a move by the SCOTUS if it went that far.

    Well now look where we are. We may end up having another Presidential Election decided by the SCOTUS. Now there is an empty seat?
    Yeah, they are planning the destruction of America via riots and a coup, but it wouldn't be the first time would it?

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Black Hills, South Dakota
    Posts
    4,681
    Feedback Score
    0
    Doesn’t matter who Trump’s nominee for SCOTUS is, there are a handful of Republican Senators who will screw this up. The usual suspects are:

    Susan Collins

    Lisa Murkowski

    Mitt Romney

    Those three are guaranteed to screw this up, and I’m sure one or two more of those idiots worried about their own re-election above all else can be counted on to make the wrong choice and also dork this whole thing up.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Largo, FL
    Posts
    258
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Averageman View Post
    Going all the way back to Obama's first term, Ginsberg could have retired, or She could have/should have waited to the middle of his second term. All of that is conjecture because she didn't and wouldn't.
    I believe because of the BS drama caused by the "Russia Probe", Ginsberg hung in there to possibly impeach Trump via a move by the SCOTUS if it went that far.

    Well now look where we are. We may end up having another Presidential Election decided by the SCOTUS. Now there is an empty seat?
    Yeah, they are planning the destruction of America via riots and a coup, but it wouldn't be the first time would it?
    Didn't the old bag say she would move to New Zealand or some such, if Trump were elected?
    Hurrah for The Bonnie Blue Flag that bears a single star

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Largo, FL
    Posts
    258
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    Isn't using the saying that you'd use every 'arrow in our quiver' racist towards Indians?
    And, that comment is discriminatory against the descendants of those who used the English longbow.
    Hurrah for The Bonnie Blue Flag that bears a single star

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    6,943
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Coal Dragger View Post
    Doesn’t matter who Trump’s nominee for SCOTUS is, there are a handful of Republican Senators who will screw this up. The usual suspects are:

    Susan Collins

    Lisa Murkowski

    Mitt Romney

    Those three are guaranteed to screw this up, and I’m sure one or two more of those idiots worried about their own re-election above all else can be counted on to make the wrong choice and also dork this whole thing up.
    Four Republicans have already come out and said that they would not support a nominee before the election. I believe it's these three plus Lindsey Graham.

Page 3 of 19 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •