Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: M110 contract for Knight's

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,783
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    1500? 2000 rifles? Rifles or the Whole ‘kit’?
    The M110 is the Semi-Automatic Sniper System, which includes:

    - a rifle with back-up iron sights and sling
    - a suppressor
    - a day optic
    - magazines
    - a bipod
    - a system carrying case
    - a cleaning kit
    - user and unit maintenance tools
    - operator and unit replacement parts

    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    So that translates to what...1,000 rifles?
    Sounds about right for about 1,000 systems plus engineering and logistic support.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,444
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by lysander View Post
    "Bids were solicited via the internet with one received."

    The way the solicitation was written, there really wasn't doubt who was getting the contract....
    What about it with the fluid someone like LMT or even Daniell Defense participating.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    E. Tennessee
    Posts
    2,368
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Good to see KAC scored a nice contract.
    ETC (SW/AW), USN (1998-2008)
    CVN-65, USS Enterprise

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    SWMT
    Posts
    8,188
    Feedback Score
    32 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    I'm still wondering about the logic of designating the HK gun the "M110A1".
    The same logic as designating M855A1 as, well, M855A1.

    Quote Originally Posted by okie View Post
    Am I the only one who feels like they could build an AR10 with off the shelf commercial parts that would outperform the M110 for a fraction of the price?
    There are plenty of people on the internet claiming their PSAs, Olys, DPMSs, Bushmasters, home-built chinesium-filled guns are just as good as (or better than) Colt, BCM, LMT, KAC, so... no. No, you are not.
    " Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
    - Samuel Adams -

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13,549
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by okie View Post
    Am I the only one who feels like they could build an AR10 with off the shelf commercial parts that would outperform the M110 for a fraction of the price?
    And for a minute Eddie Murphy thought he was a singer. Crack makes people think a lot of things.

    AR-10s SEEM so deceptively simply. But no. AR-15s have a more or less standardized form. AR-10s do not. There are receivers out that that take M14 mags, FAL mags, G3 mags, etc. then not all receivers are the same. THEN you may have BCG compatibility issues.

    I made a home made M110K1. It was NOT easy. Playing scavenger hunt for KAC parts was not hard. After it was all said and done, I saved 300 dollars. 300 measly dollars than if I just bought it outright and it still is only 95% there.

    The only AR 10 receivers I would use are KAC/LMT or Armalite.

    They just aren’t cheap.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    4,665
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly View Post
    And for a minute Eddie Murphy thought he was a singer. Crack makes people think a lot of things.

    AR-10s SEEM so deceptively simply. But no. AR-15s have a more or less standardized form. AR-10s do not. There are receivers out that that take M14 mags, FAL mags, G3 mags, etc. then not all receivers are the same. THEN you may have BCG compatibility issues.

    I made a home made M110K1. It was NOT easy. Playing scavenger hunt for KAC parts was not hard. After it was all said and done, I saved 300 dollars. 300 measly dollars than if I just bought it outright and it still is only 95% there.

    The only AR 10 receivers I would use are KAC/LMT or Armalite.

    They just aren’t cheap.
    Sadly, the Armalite has two different types of mags as well...
    Experience is a cruel teacher, gives the exam first and then the lesson.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13,549
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Grand58742 View Post
    Sadly, the Armalite has two different types of mags as well...
    You are correct but going to the AR-10A was the best thing they did in 20 years. See initially the AR-10A would have been their line but they modded it to use M14 mags. Personally, I could have lived with 10 round KAC mags if need be.

    The AR-10A is best you can get non LMT/KAC.

    The only other niggle is the Forward Assist. I don’t like it. But it is what it is.

    People don’t realize that Eagle Arms bought more than the name. The AR-10A as we know it was initially to be a Colt product of all things. There had been renewed interest during the Bush Wars in the AR-10 but it was hard to market because it just wasn’t mainstream. It was a smaller frame but the technology is not new.

    People forget that at one time, Armalite and KAC had a similar KAC/LMT vibe and some of their uppers and a few lowers were cross compatible and use original AR-10 magazines before they committed to the M-14 style.

    The Armalite and the KAC are still different guns sharing a common magazine but the quality is still there. I actually have a fairly new Armalite kit and the workmanship is impeccable. I don’t like the new logo but when I get off my ass and put it together it will be worthy.

    I’d used a B kit for a prior build and the only real issues were mag related. That is not a problem now.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    1,783
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHand View Post
    What about it with the fluid someone like LMT or even Daniell Defense participating.
    The M110 is covered under a performance specification, and therefore can be, and is, a proprietary rifle. With the contract requirement that all parts be compatible with all the other M110s in service, LMT or DD would have to have KAC's drawings to ensure this. That's why there was only one bid received.

    EDIT:
    That is also why the M110A1 is the M110A1.
    Last edited by lysander; 09-25-20 at 14:09.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,083
    Feedback Score
    0
    Congrats again to KAC (today's awards):

    "Knight's Armament Co.,* Titusville, Florida, is awarded a $25,652,000 firm-fixed-price contract for procurement of 5.56mm small arms suppressor. This contract provides for 5.56mm small arms suppressors that will be used on the M27 Infantry Automatic Rifle, M4 Carbine and M4A1 Close Quarter Battle weapon. Work will be performed in Titusville, Florida, with an expected completion date of Sept. 20, 2027. The maximum dollar value, including a base ordering period of five years with two 12-month options, is $25,652,000. Fiscal 2018 procurement (Marine Corps) funds in the amount of $6,676,971 are being obligated at time of award and will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This contract was a sole-source, with one offer solicited and one offer received. The statutory authority permitting use of other than full and open competition for this action is 10 U.S. Code § 2304 (c)(1) as implemented by Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1, “Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.” The Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, Virginia, is the contracting activity (M67854-20-D-1719)."

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,043
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly View Post
    And for a minute Eddie Murphy thought he was a singer.
    Hey now.. for a minute Eddie Murphy WAS a singer. I still Party All the Time occasionally. I even have Charlie Murphy's album when he was part of K-9 Posse.

    And when he feels like it, Eddie can still drop bombs like he did with his Dolemite movie. Didn't see that one coming after years of "Nutty Professor" crap, but I really enjoyed it. I remember Murphy's debut on a HBO special where he was one of five new comedians, that was about a year before Delirious.

    Back on topic, given the wide variation of AR-10s out there, even the original Armalites (Sudanese and Portuguese) were very different and I don't even know if parts on those were interchangeable, I'd stay with a production rifle from a reputable manufacturer.

    Really, really want a Knights one day, I think it's the only .308 that is dramatically superior to the G3 of the legacy .308s (FALs, M-14s, AR-10s and others).
    Last edited by SteyrAUG; 09-25-20 at 18:28.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •