No Durham Report before Election?

[FromMyColdDeadHand]

Are you F'ing kidding me?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._election.html

Expanding?


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...-2020-election

Who give s flying fig if it is expanding. If Trump loses, this will all get buried so deep, hard, fast that it would make Ron Jeremy's heads spin.

It is four years plus after this 'worst coup' since Lincoln happened, and we are not going to be able to learn about it before the election? Are you kidding me?

This report is key to showing:

That there really is a deep state.
That it treated Trump unfairly.
Trump wasn't lying.
There is no "Russian Collusion".


I'm starting to think that they offed RBG to take the window out for Barr to release anything.

Hearings on SCOTUS start Oct 12. There has to he a report out before then.


An election with out the Durham report is illegitimate...

If Barr buries this until after the election, and then starts goosestepping people out of their homes as Biden get bids from movers....

How do we pressure Barr to release something? Frankly I don't care at this point if Trump orders him to and he refuses and he has to start whacking people until it gets out. I don't care if it is seen as 'political'. The base needs to see what was really happening. The middle of the road people will make of it as they want, the left will denounce it.

Released after the election is meaningless, even counter productive. Image Trump loses in a tight race and then this comes out. You think the base is going to take to that kindly? Go away quietly.

If it doesn't come out after the election, they will bury this and people with it until it is a rumor, of a conspiracy, in a false memory.

It can't be so big and important that it it takes 2+ years to investigate. Anyone that has dragged it our, add obstructing justice and send in the SWAT teams with boats and FOXnews crews pre-arranged.

I can't think of anything that makes me madder. Makes me want to not vote. Why vote if our guys don't even try?

Durham has given us one guy who plead guilty but says he did nothing wrong? Guess who gets a pardon when Biden gets in.

[jpmuscle]

It’s all a game dude.... all of it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Firefly]

It’s all a game dude.... all of it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This. It’s literally WWF.

[flenna]

It’s all a game dude.... all of it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Exactly. Nothing surprises me anymore- the entire system is rigged against the honest citizenry. The rich and powerful will continue to get richer and more powerful while the rest of us are just hoping to hold off the inevitable for a while longer....

[jpmuscle]

This. It’s literally WWF.

And no Mr. Socko....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Todd.K]

This. It’s literally WWF.

Can we at least see some CNN reporter slapped across the face?

Seriously though, I have deep concerns about the clock being run out. The thing is, if there is really going to be justice then it has to be done right, not on an election schedule. I still feel like Barr is the right man, and I'm also realistic about the possibility there may not be enough HARD evidence for charges.

[Dr. Bullseye]

I told you. There is nobody in the FBI/DOJ who can be or ought to be trusted. Trump should appoint Joseph DiGenova as Special Prosecutor immediately and fire everyone in the FBI/DOJ down to the janitorial level.

[Coal Dragger]

How many times have I told you guys that no one is going to be held accountable, much less go to jail over this?

[dwhitehorne]

They can't hold anyone accountable. If they tried and someone started singing, they would all be shown as being guilty of something. Kind of like the House banking scandal where no one was held accountable because they always take care of their own. David

[Diamondback]

An alternate take:

Trump supporters and sympathetic media figures have been frustrated with the absence of Spygate-related indictments to date. However, Attorney General Barr has given us clues as to the real objective of the Durham investigation, upon which Barr is receiving regular briefings from Durham. He has repeatedly signaled that he expects Durham to, paraphrasing, “go where the evidence takes him,” and that anyone who broke the law will be prosecuted if the evidence warrants it. There is already much evidence on the public record about individuals involved in Spygate perjuring themselves, making false statements, and lying to Congress (e.g., Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Strzok, McCabe, and others). Yet, no indictments have been brought against INDIVIDUALS. That fact would tend to confirm speculation that Durham is instead pursuing a wide-ranging conspiracy charge involving many if not all participants, which would be a main reason for the delay. And with the Clintons now being tied into Spygate, the development of prosecutable evidence for the entire conspiracy will take additional time.

Furthermore, there would be additional grounds for a RICO investigation of the Spygate participants by tying in Clinton and Democrat National Committee money that enabled the conspiracy – also requiring time to develop. And finally, with the Clintons now tied into Spygate, Durham could seat grand juries in other jurisdictions besides Democrat-controlled New York, Washington DC, and Northern Virginia to obtain the necessary indictments. All this takes time.
...

Summary:

There are good reasons for Durham delaying indictments: Mueller SCO criminality and direct Clinton ties to Spygate.
Durham is almost certainly pursuing conspiracy and RICO charges against the Spygate conspirators and their funders.
The political implications of deferring indictments until after 3 November could actually favor the President.
As a chaser, a lack of indictments does not preclude a guilty plea or two before 3 November. That’s entirely possible, too.

https://www.redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2...-before-3-nov/