Nevermind. Susssman walks.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
Nevermind. Susssman walks.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Site Sponsor
NEVER try a political case in DC, the verdict will be in before you even select jurors. Durham was either stupid or in on the fix here.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
Psalms 109:8, 43:1
LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.
Senior Member
You couldn’t hold a trial in a small town and have less conflicts of interest. One juror has a kid on the same sports team as the defendant…Originally Posted by Diamondback
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Senior Member
Alternate take: The main or a major purpose for this case was to publicly “release” the report. The evidence that came out in the trial can’t be redacted, classified, or simply not released as the report probably will be.
Site Sponsor
Okay, I'll concede that End Run is another possibility.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
Psalms 109:8, 43:1
LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks